珠江三角洲海岸线旅游价值评估

doi:10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003202

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从海岸线的自然属性、旅游发展要素、区位因素3个维度构建海岸线旅游价值评估模型,以珠江三角洲为案例,定量评估了海岸线旅游价值并分析其空间差异。结果表明：珠三角滨海旅游优势岸线总占比25.50%,旅游价值中等值段岸线占比40.67%,偏低和低值段岸线占比为30.52%和3.31%。整体来看,珠三角岸线旅游价值东部整体高于西部。大陆岸线旅游价值最高的集中在惠州巽寮湾、深圳大亚湾、大鹏湾和深圳湾,旅游价值较低的集中在黄茅海西部,中部珠江入海口沿岸地区岸线旅游价值中等。岛屿岸线旅游价值空间差异较大,价值最高的集中在大亚湾海域的三门岛、喜洲岛、鸡心岛、大辣甲岛和珠江口的内伶仃岛、江门的上下川岛北部;岸线旅游价值较低的集中在珠海的万山群岛和担杆岛等。

关键词: 旅游价值, 海岸线, 评估体系, 珠江三角洲

Abstract:

The domestic demands of coastal tourism have increased rapidly in recent years, stimulating the development and utilization of coastal areas. At the same time, unreasonable development patterns bring a series of resource and environment problems that require scientific evaluation of coastal tourism value to guide regional sustainable development. This paper constructs a coastline tourism value assessment model with three dimensions: coastline natural attributes, tourism development factors, and location factors. Combined with the particularity of coastal tourism, indicators such as coastline type, sea water quality, tourism infrastructure, land use, and scenic spots are selected. The model focuses on the Pearl River Delta to quantitatively assess the tourism value and its spatial distribution on the mainland and island coastlines. The results show that in the Pearl River Delta, the advantageous coastline for tourism accounts for 25.50%, the middle value coastline for 40.67%, and the low and lowest value coastlines for 30.52% and 3.31%, respectively. From the perspective of spatial distribution, the tourism value of the eastern part of the Pearl River Delta is higher than the western part. The highest tourism value of mainland coastline is concentrated in Huizhou Xunliao Bay, Shenzhen Daya Bay, Dapeng Bay, and Shenzhen Bay. These areas have excellent water quality, long sandy coastlines, superior natural conditions, and better tourism infrastructure. The lowest tourism value of mainland coastline is concentrated in the west of Huangmaohai, mainly because most of its coastline is artificial and estuarine and the location advantage is insufficient. The tourism value of the central part of the Pearl River estuary is medium. There is a big spatial difference in the tourism value of island shoreline. The highest value is concentrated in Sanmen Island, Xizhou Island, Jixin Island, Dalajia Island in Daya Bay, Neilingding Island in the Pearl River Estuary, and the north of Shang Xiachuan Island; the lowest value is concentrated in Wanshan Island and Dangan Island in Zhuhai. On the county scale, the tourism value of the Pearl River Delta coastal area has a significant spatial autocorrelation. The coastlines with higher comprehensive value are concentrated in Bao’an District, Longgang District, Futian District, and Yantian District of Shenzhen; the coastlines with lower value are concentrated in Jinwan District and Doumen District of Zhuhai. This research has made some exploration in the scientific evaluation of the tourism value of the coastal zone and enriched the theory of tourism resources development of the coastal zone. It also has reference value for clarifying the development orientation of different coastal areas and regions, giving full play to the advantages of tourism resources, making reasonable development strategies, and providing policy support for the development of the coastal region tourism in the Pearl River Delta.

Key words: tourism value, shoreline, evaluation system, the Pearl River Delta

中图分类号:

F592

李苑君, 吴旗韬, 陈聪, 张玉玲, 张争胜, 张虹鸥. 珠江三角洲海岸线旅游价值评估[J]. 热带地理, 2020, 40(1): 164-174.

Li Yuanjun, Wu Qitao, Chen Cong, Zhang Yuling, Zhang Zhengsheng, Zhang Hong’ou. Coastline Tourism Value Evaluation in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Tropical Geography, 2020, 40(1): 164-174.

图/表 9

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

表3

表4

图4

图5

参考文献 45

[43]	[ Zhou Feifei . 2010. Research on Tourism Land use Classification and Development Model in China. Qingdao: Ocean University of China. ]
[44]	朱远峰, 尹延鸿, 朱志伟, 于洪社 . 2005. 长岛地质遗迹成因与综合评价. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 25(4):115-120.
	[ Zhu Yuanfeng, Yin Yanhong, Zhu Zhiwei and Yu Hongshe . 2005. Origin and Comprehensive Assessment of Marine Geologic Relics in Changdao Island. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 25(4):115-120. ]
[45]	朱正涛 . 2019. 海岸侵蚀脆弱性评估模型构建及其应用研究. 上海:华东师范大学.
[1]	Azzopardi E and Nash R . 2016. A Framework for Island Destination Competitiveness-Perspectives from the Island of Malta. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(3):1-29.
[2]	Botero C, Pereira C, Anfuso G and Cervantes O . 2014. Recreational Parameters as an Assessment Tool for Beach Quality. Journal of Coastal Research, 70:556-562.
[3]	Buitrago Rangel N, Correa I, Anfuso G, Ergin A and Williams A . 2013. Assessing and Managing Scenery of the Caribbean Coast of Colombia. Tourism Management, 35:41-58.
[4]	Buitrago Rangel N, Contreras-López M, Martínez C and Williams A . 2018. Can Coastal Scenery Be Managed? The Valparaíso Region, Chile as a Case Study. Ocean and Coastal Management, 163:383-400.
[5]	Crowther J, David K and Mark D W . 2001. Relationships between Microbial Water Quality and Environmental Conditions in Coastal Recreational Waters: The Fylde Coast, UK. Water Research, 35(17):4029-4038.
[6]	陈文娣 . 2014. 旅游用地分类体系构建及空间结构特征研究. 南京:南京师范大学.
	[ Chen Wendi . 2014. Study on The Construction of Tourism Land Classification System and Its Spatial Structure Characteristics. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University. ]
[7]	陈欣树 . 1989. 广东和海南岛砂质海岸地貌及其开发利用. 热带海洋,( 1):43-51.
	[ Chen Xinshu . 1989. Geomorphology and Development of Guangdong and Hainan Sand Coast. Tropical Ocean, ( 1):43-51. ]
[8]	董观志, 杨凤影 . 2005. 旅游景区游客满意度测评体系研究. 旅游学刊,( 1):27-30.
	[ Dong Guanzhi and Yang Fengying . 2005. A Study on the Evaluation System of Tourist Satisfaction Degree in Tourist Areas. Tourism Tribune, ( 1):27-30. ]
[9]	Fan J, Ming H, Li L and Su J . 2015. Evaluating Spatial-Temporal Variations and Correlation between Fecal Indicator Bacteria (FIB) in Marine Bathing Beaches. Journal of Water and Health, 13(4):1029-1038.
[10]	Getis A and Ord J K . 1992. The Analysis of Spatial Association by the Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3):189-206.
[11]	Ghermandi A and Nunes P A L D . 2013. A Global Map of Coastal Recreation Values: Results from a Spatially Explicit Meta-Analysis. Ecological Economics, 86:1-15.
[12]	Griffith J F, Cao Y, Mcgee C D and Weisberg S B . 2009. Evaluation of Rapid Methods and Novel Indicators for Assessing Microbiological Beach Water Quality. Water Research, 43(19):4900-4907.
[13]	广东省生态环境厅. 广东省海洋环境状况公报.[2018-06-04]. .
	[ Department of Ecological Environment of Guangdong Province. Bulletin on the State of Marine Environment of Guangdong Province.[2018-06-04]. ]
[14]	郭焕成, 刘军萍, 王云才 . 2000. 观光农业发展研究. 经济地理, 20(2):119-124.
	[ Guo Huancheng, Liu Junping and Wang Yuncai . 2000. The Study on Development of Tourism Agriculture. Economic Geography, 20(2):119-124. ]
[15]	Hakim L, Retnaningdyah C and Mukhzayadah M . 2014. Ecological and Social Evaluation of Coastal Tourism Destination Development: A Case Study of Balekambang, East Java. Journal of Indonesian Tourism & Development Studies, 2(1):26-32.
[16]	黄金森 . 1989. 我国不同类型海岸的开发. 海洋与海岸带开发,( 3):18-21.
	[ Huang Jinsen . 1989. Development of Different Types of Coasts in China. Ocean and Coastal Development, ( 3):18-21. ]
[17]	Liaghat M, Shahabi H, Deilami B R, Ardabili F S, Seyedi S N and Badri H . 2013. A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Technique to Analyze Coastal Tourism Sites. Apcbee Procedia, 5:479-485.
[18]	Linstone H A and Turoff M . 1975. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. New York: Addison-Wesley, 3-4.
[19]	Loomis J and Santiago L . 2013. Economic Valuation of Beach Quality Improvements: Comparing Incremental Attribute Values Estimated from Two Stated Preference Valuation Methods. Coastal Management, 41(1):75-86.
[20]	李悦铮 . 2000. 辽宁沿海地区旅游资源评价研究. 自然资源学报, 15(1):46-50.
	[ Li Yuezheng . 2000. Evaluation of Tourist Resources in Coastal Areas of Liaoning Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 15(1):46-50. ]
[21]	李占海, 柯贤坤, 周旅复, 王爱军 . 2000. 海滩旅游资源质量评比体系. 自然资源学报, 15(3):229-235.
	[ Li Zhanhai, Ke Xiankun, Zhou Lvfu and Wang Aijun . 2000. The Appraisal System of Beach Tourism Resources. Journal of Natural Resources, 15(3):229-235. ]
[22]	刘康 . 2007. 滨海休闲旅游资源价值评估与政策运用. 海洋开发与管理,( 5):96-100.
	[ Liu Kang . 2007. The Value Evaluation and Policy Application of Coastal Leisure Tourism Resources. Ocean Development and Management, ( 5):96-100. ]
[23]	刘伟涛, 顾鸿, 李春洪 . 2011. 基于德尔菲法的专家评估方法. 计算机工程, 37(S1):189-191,204.
	[ Liu Weitao, Gu Hong and Li Chunhong . 2011. Expert Evaluation Method Based on Delphi Method. Computer Engineering, 37(S1):189-191, 204. ]
[24]	Mitchell A. 2005. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis:Volume 2: Spatial Measurements and Statistics. USA: Esri Press, 26-45.
[25]	Mustain M, Armono H D and Kurniawan D T . 2015. The Evaluation of Beach Recreational Index for Coastal Tourism Zone of: Delegan, Kenjeran, and Wisata Bahari Lamongan. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 14:17-24.
[26]	彭慧, 毕宇珠 . 2015. 旅游用地分类管理浅析. 中国土地,( 2):33-34.
	[ Peng Hui and Bi Yuzhu . 2015. Analysis on Classification Management of Tourism Land. China Land, ( 2):33-34. ]
[27]	齐德利, 李加林, 葛云健, 于蓉, 张忍顺 . 2004. 沿海生态旅游资源评价指标及尺度研究——以江苏沿海为例. 自然资源学报, 19(4):508-518.
	[ Qi Deli, Li Jialin, Ge Yunjian, Yu Rong and Zhang Renshun . 2004. Indexes and Scale-Related Fields in Ecotourism Resources Evaluation-Taking Jiangsu Coast as an Example. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(4):508-518. ]
[28]	任唤麟 . 2017. 跨区域线性文化遗产类旅游资源价值评价——以长安-天山廊道路网中国段为例. 地理科学, 37(10):115-123.
	[ Ren Huanlin . 2017. On Value Evaluation of Tourism Resource of Cross-regional Linear Cultural Heritage: Taking the Routes Network of Chang’an-Tianshan Corridor in China as an Example. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 37(10):115-123. ]
[29]	Spalding M, Burke L, Wood S A, Ashpole J, Hutchison J and Ermgassen P Z . 2017. Mapping the Global Value and Distribution of Coral Reef Tourism. Marine Policy, 82:104-113.
[30]	宋洁华, 李敏纳, 蔡舒, 王平 . 2017. 海南交通可达性的测度与空间分异格局分析. 地理科学, 37(10):1507-1516.
	[ Song Jiehua, Li Minna, Cai Shu and Wang Ping . 2017. The Measurement and Spatial Differentiation Pattern of Traffic Accessibility in Hainan. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 37(10):1507-1516. ]
[31]	宋永昌, 戚仁海, 由文辉, 王祥荣, 祝龙彪 . 1999. 生态城市的指标体系与评价方法. 城市环境与城市生态,( 5):16-19.
	[ Song Yongchang, Qi Renhai, You Wenhui, Wang Xiangrong and Zhu Longbiao . 1999. A Study on Indices System and Assessment Criterion of Eco City. Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, ( 5):16-19. ]
[32]	苏为华 . 2000. 多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究. 厦门:厦门大学.
	[ Su Weihua . 2000. Research on the Theory and Method of Multi-index Comprehensive Evaluation. Xiamen: Xiamen University. ]
[33]	索安宁, 曹可, 马红伟, 王权明, 于永海 . 2015. 海岸线分类体系探讨. 地理科学, 35(7):933-937.
	[ Suo Anning, Cao Ke, Ma Hongwei, Wang Quanming and Yu Yonghai . 2015. Discussion on Classification System of Coastline. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(7):933-937. ]
[34]	吴必虎 . 2001. 区域旅游规划原理. 北京：中国旅游出版社, 26-29.
	[ Wu Bihu. 2001. Principles of Regional Tourism Planning. Beijing: China Tourism Press, . . Beijing: China Tourism Press, 26-29. ]
[35]	吴旗韬, 樊杰, 张虹鸥, 孙威, 叶玉瑶 . 2015. 跨海通道空间效益模型——以珠江口跨海通道为例. 地理研究, 34(11):2061-2072.
	[ Wu Qitao, Fan Jie, Zhang Hong’ou, Sun Wei and Ye Yuyao . 2015. Spatial Effects of Different Fixed Links on Accessibility and Regional Economic Linkage in Pearl River Delta. Geographical Research, 34(11):2061-2072. ]
[36]	徐勤政, 刘鲁, 彭珂 . 2010. 城乡规划视角的旅游用地分类体系研究. 旅游学刊, 25(7):54-61.
	[ Xu Qinzheng, Liu Lu and Peng Ke . 2010. Study on the Classification of Land Use for Tourism under the Perspective of Urban-Rural Planning. Tourism Tribune, 25(7):54-61. ]
[37]	许靖 . 2012. 浙江省海岸带旅游资源CSS评价. 金华:浙江师范大学.
	[ Xu Jing . 2012. The CSS Evaluation System of Zhejiang Coastal Tourism. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University. ]
[38]	杨光梅, 李文华, 闵庆文 . 2006. 生态系统服务价值评估研究进展——国外学者观点. 生态学报, 26(1):205-212.
	[ Yang Guangmei, Li Wenhua and Min Qingwen . 2006. Review of Foreign Opinions on Evaluation of Ecosystem Services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(1):205-212. ]
[39]	于杰, 陈国宝, 黄梓荣, 陈作志 . 2014. 近10年间广东省3个典型海湾海岸线变迁的遥感分析. 海洋湖沼通报,( 3):91-96.
	[ Yu Jie, Chen Guobao, Huang Zirong and Chen Zuozhi . 2014. Changes in the Coastline of Three Typical Bays in Guangdong During Recent 10 Years Revealed by Satellite Image. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, ( 3):91-96. ]
[40]	Zhang F, Wang X H, Paulo A L D and Ma N C . 2015. The Recreational Value of Gold Coast Beaches, Australia: An Application of the Travel Cost Method. Ecosystem Services, 11:106-114.
[41]	张爱国 . 1991. 土地类型学在区域旅游资源评价中的应用尝试——以粤北地区为例. 山西师大学报(自然科学版),( 4):70-75.
	[ Zhang Aiguo . 1991. Try to Use Land Typology to the Evaluation of Regional Tourist Resources-Northern Guangdong as Example. Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), ( 4):70-75. ]
[42]	郑建瑜, 且钟禹, 李学伦 . 1998. 青岛南海岸海水浴场的旅游环境质评价. 海洋环境科学,( 1):34-41.
	[ Zheng Jianyu, Qie Zhongyu and Li Xuelun . 1998. The Environmental Quality Assessment on the Bathing Beaches in South Seashore of Qingdao City. Marine Environmental Science, ( 1):34-41. ]
[43]	周菲菲 . 2010. 我国旅游用地分类与开发模式研究. 青岛:中国海洋大学.
[45]	[ Zhu Zhengtao . 2019. Research on Construction and Application of Coastal Erosion Vulnerability Assessment Model. Shanghai: East China Normal University. ]

评价指标			计算结果	赋分结果
1自然因素（50％）	1.1岸线类型（60％）	粉沙淤泥质	—	1
		砂质	—	5
		河口	—	1
		人工	—	2
		基岩	—	3
		生物岸线	—	4
	1.2海水水质（40％）	Ⅰ类	—	5
		Ⅱ类	—	4
		Ⅲ类	—	3
		Ⅳ类	—	2
		劣Ⅳ类	—	1
2旅游发展因素（20％）	2.1旅游吸引物（30％）	岸线1 km范围旅游景区景点个数（Q_a）	2/1/0	5/3/1
		岸线1 km范围是否拥有绿道	有	5
		岸线1 km范围是否拥有绿道	无	0
	2.2岸线后方土地利用（20％）	林业用地交通	—	5
		农业用地	—	4
		建设用地	—	3
		水利用地	—	2
		其他用地类型	—	1
	2.3旅游接待设施（50％）	岸线3 km内酒店数量（Q_b）	40/80/120/160/200	1/2/3/4/5
	2.3旅游接待设施（50％）	岸线3 km内饭店数量（Q_c）	50/100/150/200/250	1/2/3/4/5
3区位因素（30％）		加权交通可达性（A_i）	49 000/41 000/33 000/17 000/9 000	1/2/3/4/5

评估等级	自然价值	旅游发展价值	区位价值	总价值
高	5.17	3.03	50.10	5.50
偏高	40.45	10.89	29.19	20.00
中	6.26	12.43	12.87	40.67
偏低	9.64	22.62	2.84	30.52
低	38.48	51.03	5.00	3.31

指标名称	自然因素分值	旅游发展因素分值	区位因素分值	综合分值
Moran’s I	0.848 8	0.677 1	0.981 1	0.858 1
Z得分	929.830 8	305.947 2	1 074.739 5	940.005 7
P值	0.000 0	0.000 0	0.000 0	0.000 0