• 综述 •

### 发展转型视域下的乡村空间分化、重构与治理研究进展及展望

1. 1.，中山大学 地理科学与规划学院，广州 510275
2.，中国区域协调发展与乡村建设研究院，广州 510275
• 收稿日期:2019-12-26 修回日期:2020-04-10 出版日期:2020-07-31 发布日期:2020-08-11
• 作者简介:杨忍（1984－），男，贵州毕节人，博士，副教授，博导，主要从事乡村地理，城乡发展与土地利用研究，（E-mail）yangren0514@163.com
• 基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41871177);广州市科技计划项目(20170701009)

### Progress and Prospects in Rural Space Diversification, Reconstruction, and Governance from a Development Perspective

Ren Yanga,2(), Xiuli Luoa

1. a.School of Geogrphy nd Plnning，Sun Yt-sen University; b. Chin Regionl Coordinted Development nd Rurl Construction Institute, Guangzhou 510275, China
• Received:2019-12-26 Revised:2020-04-10 Online:2020-07-31 Published:2020-08-11

Abstract:

With industrialization, urbanization, informatization, and economic globalization, there is significant diversification in rural areas, including the social and economic devolopment and rural landscape, land-use structure, urban—rural relationship, consumption structure, and governance pattern. Development and evolution are types of spatial transformation, and their differentiation is significant in rural areas. With changes in the relationship between human beings and the environment in rural areas, problems such as the gradual disappearance of traditional villages, loss of regional identity, precariousness of villagers’ development prospects, and loss of autonomy tend to arise. The renaissance and revitalization of rural areas have become the core target of regional and rural development in this new era. Development, together with the theoretical construction of rural geography, now faces a critical period of opportunity. The mechanism of interaction between the internal and external motivations of rural spatial differentiation needs to be clarified, and geographic parameters concerning the reconstruction of rural multidimensional space need to be examined carefully, as they take a scientific approach in exploring comprehensive rural governance. These are beneficial in strengthening both rural construction and the framework of governance theory. This paper systematically reviews the progress of research on rural spatial differentiation, reconstruction, and governance both at home and abroad. We found that, internationally, research on rural geography is more diverse, and theories and methods from the field of political economics and sociology are widely used. These research methods are mainly qualitative, focusing on the theoretical interpretation of the construction and translation of the actor-network of cognition, differentiation, and reconstruction of rural space. Further, the main body and framework of rural community governance are analyzed deeply. Domestic research, in contrast, focuses on the differentiation and reorganization of rural material space, but the content framework and methodology of rural spatial differentiation, reconstruction, and governance remain insufficient. Accordingly, this paper—guided by the theory of territorial system of human—environment interaction on a macro scale—systematically examines the spatial differentiation types and dynamic mechanism of rural development and transformation under multiple external environments in China. On a medium-micro scale, the comprehensive study of the rural human—environment relationship in a regional system is implemented, focusing on element structure, function change, element reconstruction, and space governance. We performed a space gradient analysis using urban—rural continuous spectrum geographic transects, which analyzed internal multidimensional space differentiation and reconstructed the scientific logic of governance in different locations and with different types of rural space. By integrating geography, sociology, politics, management, and other subjects, we constructed a unique theory framework for the transformation of rural space in China. Rural space governance is an important part of territorial space control and social governance, and is of interest across multiple academic disciplines. The collaborative mechanism between the governance of space and the participating community, as well as the approaches and models of village construction management and spatial governance used, needs an urgent conclusion and summary.

• F323