旅游发展背景下侨乡地方意义的叠写与地方认同——以泉州市晋江梧林侨乡为例

doi:10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003422

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

运用质性研究方法，以泉州市晋江梧林侨乡为例，从地方意义叠写中的实体维度、社会关系、地方价值观3个层面考察侨乡地方意义叠写的建构特征，揭示了旅游发展背景下侨乡地方意义的叠写过程以及由此带来的包括海外华侨在内不同主体的地方认同问题。研究发现：1）人地错位下的意义叠写主要通过想象和旅游系统等传导机制完成，使侨乡呈现出海外华侨“形式上不在场”，但“内容上处处在场”的特征，并且推动梧林向传统与现代杂糅的地方格局转变。2）地方意义的叠写具有关系属性，多元互动是其形成过程中的显著特征。地方意义本质上是人地关系的一种表现形式，当人地关系不再由传统的地缘关系或亲缘关系决定时，人与地方这一对弱纽带关系也并不能够通过地方意义加以巩固，表现为“侨—眷—乡”关系的异化。3）在地方价值观上，侨乡地方意义经历了从家尺度到国家与民族尺度的意义叠写，凸显了旅游背景下权力对地方意义的选择性表征，动态展演了不同主体的空间价值观取向之争和国家主流文化价值观对地方的引领。4）旅游发展背景下侨乡地方意义叠写引发了海外华侨兼具工具性和选择性的“购物车”式认同以及本地居民的差异化认同，不同主体的认同结构充满张力、分异乃至冲突。

关键词: 侨乡, 地方意义, 地方认同, 叠写, 旅游发展, 福建

Abstract:

Using qualitative research methods and taking Wulin in Jinjiang, Quanzhou City as an example, this study investigated the construction characteristics of Qiaoxiang's place meaning superposition from three aspects: entity dimension, social relations and local values, and revealed the superposition process of the place meaning of Qiaoxiang under the background of tourism development and the resulting place identity problems of different subjects including overseas Chinese. The study found that: (1) The superposition of place meaning under the dislocation of man and land is mainly completed through transmission mechanisms such as imagination and tourism system, which makes the overseas Chinese "absent in form" but "present everywhere in content" in Qiaoxiang, and promotes the transformation of Wulin into a place pattern mixed with tradition and modernity. (2) The superposition of place meaning has the attribute of relationship, and multivariate interactions are the remarkable features during its formation. The place meaning is essentially a manifestation of the man-land relationship. When the man-land relationship is no longer determined by the traditional geographic relationship or kinship, the weak bond relationship between man and land cannot be consolidated by the place meaning, which is manifested as the alienation of the relationship of "overseas Chinese-family members-hometown". (3) In terms of local values, the place meaning of Qiaoxiang has experienced a meaning superposition from the home scale to the national and ethnic scales, highlighting the selective representation of power on the place meaning in the context of tourism, and dynamically displaying the controversy on the orientation of spatial values of different subjects and the guidance of the national mainstream cultural values to the local. (4) In the context of tourism development, the superposition of the place meaning of Qiaoxiang has triggered the instrumental and selective "shopping cart" identity of overseas Chinese and the differentiated identity of local residents, and the identity structure of different subjects is full of tension, differentiation and even conflict.

Key words: Qiaoxiang, place meaning, place identity, superposition, tourism development, Fujian

中图分类号:

F592

杨勇, 邹永广, 孙琦. 旅游发展背景下侨乡地方意义的叠写与地方认同——以泉州市晋江梧林侨乡为例[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(1): 29-42.

Yong Yang, Yongguang Zou, Qi Sun. The Superposition of Place Meaning and Place Identity of Qiaoxiang in the Context of Tourism Development: A Case Study of Wulin, Jinjiang, Quanzhou[J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(1): 29-42.

图/表 3

图1

表1

图2

参考文献 0

	Blunt A. 2007. Cultural Geographies of Migration: Mobility, Transnationality and Diaspora. Progressin Human Geography, (31): 684-694.
	白凯，王博林．2021．拉萨藏漂的自我表达与地方意义解读．地理学报，76（8）：2048-2066．[Bai Kai and Wang Bolin. 2021. The Interpretation of Place Meaning and the Expression of Self-Concept: A Case Study of Tibet Drifters in Lhasa, Tibet. Acta Geographica Sinica, 76(8): 2048-2066.]
	Camilleri C and Malewska H. 1997. Socialization and Identity Strategies. In: Berry J W, Dasen P R and Saraswathi T S. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Basic Processes and Human Development. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
	蔡晓梅，刘美新，林家惠，麻国庆．2021．旅游发展背景下乡村绅士化的动态表征与形成机制——以广东惠州上良村为例．旅游学刊，36（5）：55-68．[Cai Xiaomei, Liu Meixin, Lin Jiahui and Ma Guoqing. 2021. Dynamic Representation and Formation Mechanism of Rural Gentrification in the Context of Tourism Development: A Case Study of Shangliang Village, Huizhou, Guangdong. Tourism Tribune, 36(5): 55-68.]
	陈达. 2011. 南洋华侨与闽粤社会. 北京：商务印书馆. [Chen Da. 2011. Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia and Fujian and Guangdong Society. Beijing: The Commercial Press. ]
	David Gerber. 2006. Authors of Their Lives: the Personal Correspondence of British Immigrants to North America in the Nineteenth Century. New York: New York University Press.
	杜连峰，崔亦茹. 2020. 景观叠写视角下的客家红色旧址修复工程——以赣南白鹭村为例.吕梁学院学报，10（1）：56-59. [Du Lianfeng and Cui Yiru. 2020. Hakka Red Site Restoration Project from the Perspective of Landscape Overlay—Taking Bailu Village in Southern Anhui as an Example. Journal of Lvliang University, 10 (1): 56-59. ]
	段义孚．2011．无边的恐惧．北京：北京大学出版社．[Duan Yifu. 2011. Boundless Fear. Beijing: Peking University Press.]
	Easthope H. 2004. A Place Called Home. Housing, Theory and Society, 21(3): 128-138.
	费孝通.2006.乡土中国. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 179-207. [Fei Xiaotong. 2006.Rural China. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 179-207. ]
	Glen D. 1988. Peterson, Socialist China and the Huaqiao: The Transition to Socialism in the Overseas Chinese Areas of Rural Guangdong, 1949-1956. Modern China, 14(3): 56-66.
	Gustafson P. 2001. Meanings of Place: Everyday Experience and Theoretical Conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1): 5-16.
	郭文，杨桂华．2018．民族旅游村寨仪式实践演变中神圣空间的生产——对翁丁佤寨村民日常生活的观察．旅游学刊，33（5）：92-103．[Guo Wen and Yang Guihua. 2018. Sacred Space Production on the Evolution of Ethnic Tourism Village Ritual Practices: Based on the Observation of Wengding Va Villagers' Daily Life. Tourism Tribune, 33(5): 92-103.]
	郭文．2019．神圣空间的地方性生产、居民认同分异与日常抵抗——中国西南哈尼族箐口案例．旅游学刊，34（6）：96-108．[Guo Wen. 2019. Placeness Production of Sacred Space, Resident Identity Differentiation and Daily Resistance: A Case Study of Qingkou Village of Hani Nationality in Southwest China. Tourism Tribune, 34(6): 96-108.]
	郭文，黄震方．2020a．旅游与竹地摩梭人“家”空间的多维生产及身份认同建构．地理研究，39（4）：907-921．[Guo Wen and Huang Zhenfang. 2020a. Tourism and Multi-Dimensional Production and Identity Construction of the "Home" in Zhudi Village. Geographical Research, 39(4): 907-921.]
	郭文．2020b．空间意义的叠写与地方认同——中国最后一个原始部落翁丁案例．地理研究，39（11）：2449-2465．[Guo Wen. 2020b. The Superscription of Spatial Meaning and Local Identity of the Last Primitive Tribe of Wengding Village, China. Geographical Research, 39(11): 2449-2465.]
	郭文，朱竑．2020c．旅游空间生产的叠写与认同．旅游学刊，35（11）：1-3．[Guo Wen and Zhu Hong. 2020c. Overwriting and Identification of Tourism Spatial Production. Tourism Tribune, 35(11): 1-3. ]
	Hidalgo M C and Hernández B. 2001. Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3): 273-281.
	胡宪洋，白凯，花菲菲，王利尖．2020．西安曲江新区移民群体的地方意义建构与检验．地理学报，75（8）：1773-1789．[Hu Xianyang, Bai Kai, Hua Feifei and Wang Lijian. 2020. The Construction and Examination of Migrants' Place Meaning in Xi'an Qujiang New District. Acta Geographica Sinica, 75(8): 1773-1789.]
	黄晓坚．2013．广东潮汕地区海外移民形态的新变化．华侨华人历史研究，（1）：20-30．[Huang Xiaojian. 2013. New Migration Pattern in the Chaozhou-Shantou Area of Guangdong Province. Overseas Chinese History Studies, (1): 20-30.]
	Johnston T and Dongqiang E.1993. A Last Look: Western Architecture in Old Shanghai. Shanghai: Old China Hand Press.
	蒋婷，张朝枝. 2019. 开平碉楼与村落地方意义的游客阐释. 世界地理研究，28（3）：194-201. [Jiang Ting and Zhang Chaozhi. 2019. Tourist Interpretation of Place Meaning in Kaiping Diaolou and Villages. World Regional Studies, 28(3): 194-201. ]
	蒋婷，张朝枝．2021．侨乡建筑文化遗产流散产权三维关系的形成与特征——以开平碉楼为例．南京社会科学，（2）：166-172．[Jiang Ting and Zhang Chaozhi. 2021. The Formation and Characteristics of the Three-Dimensional Relationship of Property Rights of the Architectural Cultural Heritage in the Hometown of Overseas Chinese: Taking Kaiping Diaolou as an Example. Social Sciences in Nanjing, (2): 166-172.]
	King R. 2012. Geography and Migration Studies: Retrospect and Prospect. Population, Space and Place, 18(2): 134-153.
	Li W. 2006. Beyond Chinatown, Beyond Enclave: Reconceptualizing Contemporary Chinese Settlements in the United States. Geo Journal, 64(1): 31-40.
	Low S M and Altman I. 1992. Place Attachment: A Conceptual Inquiry. In: Altman I. Place Attachment. New York: Plenum Press, 1-12.
	Lucas S and Purkayastha B. 2007. "Where is Home?" Here and There: Transnational Experiences of Home among Canadian Migrants in the United States. Geo Journal, 68(2/3): 243-251.
	李菲菲．2018．隐蔽的龙王：大理蝴蝶泉的地方意义与景观叠写．湖北民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版），36（3）：61-65．[Li Feifei. 2018. The Hidden Dragon King: The Local Significance and Landscape Overwriting of Dali Butterfly Spring. Journal of Hubei Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 36(3): 61-65.]
	李思睿．2017．跨国网络与粤东侨乡社会变迁：以梅州市大埔县百侯镇为例．广西民族研究，（1）：79-86．[Li Sirui. 2017. Transnational Network and Social Change in Homelands of Overseas Chinese: A Case Study of Baihou, Meizhou. Guangxi Ethnic Studies, (1): 79-86.]
	梁天屹，蔡瑶. 2018. 价值观教育的仪式化机制. 当代中国价值观研究，3（1）：88-98. [Liang Tianyi and Cai Yao. 2018. The Ritualization Mechanism of Values Education. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Values, 3(1): 88-98. ]
	梁永佳．2013．“叠写”的限度——一个大理节庆的地方意义与非遗化．宗教人类学，4（1）：127-143．[Liang Yongjia. 2013. The Limits of "Overwriting"—The Local Significance and Intangible Heritage of a Dali Festival. Religious Anthropology, 4(1): 127-143.]
	刘登翰. 2020. 过番歌：中国海外移民的民间记忆. 华文文学，（5）：5-10. [Liu Denghan. 2020. The 'Guo Fan Ge', or 'Songs across the Foreign Countries: The Folkloric Memory of the Chinese lmmigrants Overseas. Literatures in Chinese, (5): 5-10. ]
	刘名涛．2018．空间、权力与日常生活：乡村文化广场的空间政治研究．武汉：华中师范大学．[Liu Mingtao. 2018.Space, Power and Daily Life: A Study on the Space Politics of Rural Cultural Square. Wuhai: Central China Normal University. ]
	May J. 1996. Globalization and the Politics of Place: Place and Identity in an Inner London Neighbourhood. Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, 21(1): 194-215.
	Merrifield A. 1993. Place and Space: A Lefebvrian Reconciliation. Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, 18(4): 516-531.
	闽南网. 2019. 晋江梧林这百幢古厝洋楼盛满闽南华侨的乡愁.（2019-03-29）[2021-12-09]. http://www.mnw.cn/jinjiang/news/2146136.html. [Minnan Website.2019. These Hundred Ancient Houses and Foreign Houses in Wulin, Jinjiang are Full of the Nostalgia of Overseas Chinese in Southern Fujian..（2019-03-29）[2021-12-09]. http://www.mnw.cn/jinjiang/news/2146136.html. ]
	Papastergiadis N. 1998. Dialogues in the Diaspora: Essays and Conversations on Cultural Identity. London: Rivers Oram Press.
	Pred A. 1984. Place as Historically Contingent Process: Structuration and the Time-geography of Becoming Places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2): 279-297.
	Proshansky H M, Proshansky H M and Kaminoff R. 1983. Place-Identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1): 57-83.
	Relph E C. 1975. Place and Placelessness. Geographical Review, 68(1): 116.
	冉琰杰，张国雄．2020．地域视野下的侨乡文化——以广东侨乡为例．广东社会科学，（6）：131-139．[Ran Yanjie and Zhang Guoxiong. 2020. Culture of Hometown of Overseas Chinese from Regional Perspective: A Case Study of Hometown of Overseas Chinese in Guangdong. Social Sciences in Guangdong, (6): 131-139.]
	Stedman R C. 2003. Is It Really Just a Social Construction? The Contribution of the Physical Environment to Sense of Place. Society & Natural Resources, 16(8): 671-685.
	Swidler A. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2): 60-68.
	孙九霞，周一．2015.遗产旅游地居民的地方认同——“碉乡”符号、记忆与空间．地理研究，34（12）：2381-2394．[Sun Jiuxia and Zhou Yi. 2015. Residents' Place Identity at Heritage Sites—Symbols, Memories and Space of the "Home of Diaolou". Geographical Research, 34(12): 2381-2394.]
	Tuan Y. 1974. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perceptions, Attitudes and Values. New York: Columbia University Press.
	Ujang N and Zakariya K. 2015. The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170: 709-717.
	Wang C. 2014. How Does a House Remember？Heritage-Ising Return Migration in an Indonesian-Chinese House Museum in Guangdong, PRC. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(4): 454-474.
	Waters J L. 2006. Geographies of Cultural Capital: Education, International Migration and Family Strategies Between Hong Kong and Canada. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(2): 179-192.
	Williams D R. 2014. Making Sense of "Place": Reflections on Pluralism and Positionality in Place Research. Landscape & Urban Planning, 131: 74-82.
	Wynveen C J and Kyle G T. 2015. A Place Meaning Scale for Tropical Marine Settings. Environmental Management, 55(1): 128-142.
	王敏，江荣灏，朱竑．2017．跨国宗族网络与侨乡地方意义的建构研究——以前美村为例．世界地理研究，26（1）：112-123．[Wang Min, Jiang Ronghao and Zhu Hong. 2017. Transnational Lineage Network and the Construction of Place Meaning of Qiaoxiang—A Case Study on Qianmei Village. World Regional Studies, 26(1): 112-123.]
	王晓云．2015．根文化意义及移民的适应性困惑——以甘肃藏族村落GL村的调查为例．西南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版），36（3）：29-35．[Wang Xiaoyun. 2015. Root Cultural Significance and Immigrants' Adaptability Confusion: A Case Study of GL Village, a Tibetan Village in Gansu. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science), 36(3): 29-35.]
	文彤，张庆芳．2017．家文化视角下本土旅游小企业的代际传承.旅游学刊，32（8）：93-103．[Wen Tong and Zhang Qingfang. 2017. Intergenerational Succession of Local Small Tourism Businesses: The Perspective of Chinese Family Culture. Tourism Tribune, 32(8): 93-103.]
	翁时秀，卢建鸣．2019．空间治理的社区实践与正当性建构——以浙江省永嘉县芙蓉村传统村落保护为例．地理研究，38（6）：1322-1332．[Weng Shixiu and Lu Jianming. 2019. The Local Practices and Legitimacy Construction in Spatial Governance: A Case Study of Traditional Village Protection in Furong Village, Zhejiang Province. Geographical Research,38(6): 1322-1332.]
	吴泰. 1994. 晋江华侨志. 上海：上海人民出版社. [Wu Tai. 1994. Records of Overseas Chinese in Jinjiang. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House. ]
	肖文燕．2009．华侨与侨乡民居：客家围屋的“中西合璧”——以客都梅州为例．江西财经大学学报，（6）：68-72．[Xiao Wenyan. 2009. Overseas Chinese and the Hometown of Overseas Chinese: The "Combination of Chinese and Western" in Hakka Enclosures: Taking the Hakka Capital of Meizhou as an Example. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, (6): 68-72.]
	熊燕军，陈雍．2018．从“经济侨乡”到“文化侨乡”：侨乡可持续发展的新视角．华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版），（4）：39-47．[Xiong Yanjun and Chen Yong. 2018. From "Economic Overseas Chinese Hometown" to "Cultural Overseas Chinese Hometown": A New Perspective of the Sustainable Development.Journal of Huaqiao University (Philosophy & Social Sciences),(4): 39-47.]
	颜丽金，王元林．2003．闽南侨乡寻根旅游之探讨．人文地理，18（6）：48-51．[Yan Lijin and Wang Yuanlin. 2003. Research on the Seeking-Roots Tourism in Southern Fujian. Human Geography, 18(6): 48-51.]
	郑娜娜，许佳君．2019．易地搬迁移民社区的空间再造与社会融入——基于陕西省西乡县的田野考察．南京农业大学学报（社会科学版），19（1）：58-68．[Zhen Nana and Xu Jiajun. 2019. Migrant Communities: A Case Study Based on the Field Research of Xixiang County in Shananxi. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science), 19(1): 58-68.]
	张兴泰，陈志钢，张骁鸣，金红燕．2021．流动与想象：西藏地方意义的多元互构研究．地理研究，40（8）：2292-2313．[Zhang Xingtai, Chen Zhigang, Zhang Xiaoming and Jin Hongyan. 2021. Liquidity and Imagination: A Study of Multiple Mutual-Construction of Tibetan Place Meaning. Geographical Research, 40(8): 2292-2313.]
	赵振斌，褚玉杰，郝亭，张铖．2015．汉长安城遗址乡村社区意义空间构成．地理学报，70（10）：1606-1621．[Zhao Zhenbin, Chu Yujie, Hao Ting and Zhang Cheng. 2015. Meaning Space Structure of Rural Community in Han Chang'an City Historical Site. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(10): 1606-1621.]
	郑振满．2010．国际化与地方化：近代闽南侨乡的社会文化变迁．近代史研究，（2）：62-75．[Zhen Zhenman. 2010. Internationalization and Localization: Social and Cultural Changes in the Hometowns of Overseas Chinese in Modern South Fujian. Modern Chinese History Studies, (2): 62-75.]
	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2016. 关于公布第四批列入中国传统村落名录的村落名单的通知. (2016-12-09) [2021-12-09]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/tzgg/201612/20161222_230060.html. [Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. 2016. The Announcement of the Fourth Batch of Villages Listed in the List of Traditional Chinese Villages. (2016-12-09) [2021-12-09]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/gongkai/fdzdgknr/tzgg/201612/20161222_230060.html. ]
	周尚意，杨鸿雁，孔翔．2011．地方性形成机制的结构主义与人文主义分析：以798和M50两个艺术区在城市地方性塑造中的作用为例．地理研究，30（9）：1566-1576．[Zhou Shangyi, Yang Hongyan and Kong Xiang. 2011. The Structuralistic and Humanistic Mechanism of Placeness: A Case Study of 798 and M50 Art Districts. Geographical Research, 30(9): 1566-1576.]
	朱竑．2020．中国旅游发展笔谈——旅游领域的认同研究．旅游学刊，35（11）：1．[Zhu Hong. 2020. Written Talks on China's Tourism Development—Research on Identity in the Tourism Field. Tourism Tribune, 35(11): 1.]
	郑诗琳，朱竑，唐雪琼．2016．旅游商业化背景下家的空间重构——以西双版纳傣族园傣家乐为例．热带地理，36（2）：225-236．[Zhen Shilin, Zhu Hong and Tang Xueqiong. 2016. Space Reconstruction of Home under the Background of Tourism Commercialization: A Case Study of Dai Family Hotel in Xishuangbanna. Tropical Geography, 36(2): 225-236.]

编号	称呼	性别	年龄/岁	身份	编码
1	蔡先生	男	60~65	梧林村退休书记	C-01
2	蔡先生	男	65~70	梧林村老年活动中心主任	C-02
3	蔡女士	女	55~60	梧林村村民	C-03
4	李女士	女	40~45	小卖部业主	C-04
5	蔡女士	女	35~40	梧林村村民	C-05
6	蔡先生	男	55~60	梧林村村民	C-06
7	张女士	女	60~65	梧林村村民	C-07
8	林女士	女	60~65	梧林村侨眷	C-08
9	蔡先生	男	30~35	梧林村侨眷	C-09
10	张先生	男	40~45	梧林村保安	G-01
11	陈先生	男	35~40	梧林村开发办工作人员	G-02
12	蔡先生	男	40~45	梧林村开发办工作人员	G-03
13	刘女士	女	30~35	青普公司工作人员	T-01
14	周女士	女	25~30	青普公司工作人员	T-02
15	陈女士	女	30~35	游客中心讲解员	T-03
16	杨先生	男	30~35	青普公司人文度假总经理	T-04
17	陈先生	男	75~80	退休工人	Y-01
18	张先生	男	50~65	公司职员	Y-02
19	林女士	女	20~25	学生	Y-03
20	蔡先生	男	55~60	旅菲华侨	Y-04
21	林女士	女	45~50	旅菲华侨	Y-05
22	蔡先生	男	30~35	旅菲华侨	Y-06
23	蔡先生	男	40~45	返乡华侨	Y-07
24	蔡女士	女	60~65	返乡华侨	Y-08
25	康女士	女	40~45	华侨家属	Y-09

[1]	汪丽, 张拓, 胡玲玲. “村改居”后中小城市居民与迁入移民地方认同差异及其影响因素[J]. 热带地理, 2021, 41(5): 1034-1045.
[2]	李飞, 马继刚, 刘祥辉. 线性文化遗产居民的感知价值与期望价值——以滇越铁路为例[J]. 热带地理, 2021, 41(1): 93-103.
[3]	林元城, 杨忍, 赖秋萍, 王敏. 地方感的塑造与乡村治理：潮汕宗祠案例[J]. 热带地理, 2020, 40(4): 732-743.
[4]	李威鹏，邱新法，曾燕，施国萍，徐金勤，王丹丹. 福建省复杂地形下旬平均气温分布式模拟[J]. 热带地理, 2019, 39(2): 229-236.
[5]	张隆龙，劳颖宜，程国宇，王敏. 工业用地转型下地理想象与地方意义构建 ——广州广钢新城案例[J]. 热带地理, 2019, 39(1): 99-107.
[6]	郭文露，钟赛香，刘艳芳，杨钰颖. 基于扎根理论和探索性因子分析的大学生地方认同维度研究——以武汉大学为例[J]. 热带地理, 2018, 38(5): 726-736.
[7]	孟凯. 旅游发展引导下乡村城市化的驱动力——以云台山景区内乡村为例[J]. 热带地理, 2016, 36(5): 786-794.
[8]	陈科比，杨成凤. 福建省制造业内部产业结构评价与演变趋势[J]. 热带地理, 2016, 36(5): 815-822.
[9]	吴丽敏，黄震方，王坤，张郴. 国内外旅游地地方依恋研究综述[J]. 热带地理, 2015, 35(2): 275-283.
[10]	黄嘉玲，何深静. 非洲裔移民在穗宗教场所地方感特征及其形成机制——基于广州石室圣心大教堂的实证研究[J]. 热带地理, 2014, 34(3): 308-318.
[11]	黄洵，黄民生，黄飞萍. 福建省温室气体排放影响因素分析[J]. 热带地理, 2013, 33(6): 674-680.
[12]	傅世锋, 蒋金龙, 李胜睿, 郑朝洪. 福建省海洋环境保护规划信息系统设计与实现[J]. 热带地理, 2011, 31(6): 593-597.
[13]	周志红, 廖继武, 周永章. 自然保护与旅游发展的互动及其机制研究——以鼎湖山自然保护区为例[J]. 热带地理, 2011, 31(6): 623-628.
[14]	陈小瑜, 余明. 基于空间聚类分析的福建省各县市经济发展水平研究[J]. 热带地理, 2007, 27(4): 343-347.
[15]	陈斓, 伍世代, 陈培健. 福建港口体系结构研究[J]. 热带地理, 2007, 27(3): 249-253,283.