博物馆文化展演与城市记忆活化传承 ——基于旅游留言档案的文本分析

doi:10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003120

摘要
图/表
参考文献(66)
相关文章 (2)
点击分布统计
下载分布统计

全文: PDF (811 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS) 背景资料

摘要通过对广州南越王博物馆2015年1月至2017年7月期间的1 294条旅游留言档案（线下留言207条，线上留言1 087条）的文本分析，发现建筑遗址、文物遗产、解说系统和游客参与共同构成了博物馆文化展演的“舞台”“道具”“演员”和“观众”维度因素体系，“建筑遗址”通过真实遗址和现代展馆构建了满足观众对历史文化想象的“舞台”，“文物遗产”和“解说系统”分别以静态和动态的方式将城市记忆内涵进行解构，最后“游客参与”使记忆主体发挥能动性，完成自身对记忆内涵的再编码，实现城市记忆的建构和传承，因此这4个因素在城市记忆构建过程中分别发挥了唤醒、强化、活化和传承作用，构建了博物馆城市记忆链，并进一步强调了记忆主体感知行为、博物馆文化原真特性对于文化展演和记忆传承效果的重要影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：城市记忆, 文化展演, 记忆活化, 记忆传承, 博物馆

Abstract：As a space to record urban culture and history, museum is an important place to inherit urban memory. From the perspective of “cultural performance”, this article conducted a text analysis of tourist comments concerning the Museum of the Western Han Dynasty Mausoleum of the Nanyue King. A total of 1 294 tourist comments (207 offline comments and 1 087 online comments) were considered, and the four dimensions were found to constitute the factor system of cultural performance in museum, including architectural sites, cultural heritage, interpretation system, and tourist participation. In particular, initially, as a space of urban memory, the dimension of “architectural sites” is just like a stage for performance, which not only satisfies tourists' imagination of urban history and culture, but also awakens their perception of historical memory. Secondly, the dimension of “cultural heritage” confirms the unique cultural connotation and historical background in Guangzhou through the way of physical display, which helps tourists enhance their sense of cultural identity and strengthen their urban memory. Thirdly, the dimension of “interpretation system”, including professional commentators and multimedia technology, is just like the actors in performance, presenting the history and culture of the city in a dynamic way, and helping tourists understand the deep meaning of history and culture. Lastly, the dimension of “tourist participation” is the most important role in the process of urban memory. Tourists take the initiative to participate in activities and realize the transformation from “passive participation” to “active participation”, fulfilling the understanding of urban memory. Furthermore, this article emphasizes the important role of the perception of memory subject and the authenticity of culture in the process of urban memory. On the one hand, the form of memory is an interactive process, so that it is necessary to realize the understanding of cultural connotation through communication between memory subject and object. In this case, the content coding about the tourists’ perception accounts for about 51.08%, therefore, the behavior of memory subject determines the effect of cultural performance in museum. On the other hand, 41.4% of the content coding comes from real carriers, such as architectural sites and cultural heritage, which indicates that only by maintaining the original and integrity of traditional culture can tourists achieve the construction of urban memory. In a word, these four dimensions form an urban memory chain for museum and respectively play the roles of awakening, strengthening, activating and inheriting in the process of urban memory construction. In addition, both the behavior of memory subject and the cultural authenticity play indispensable roles in the construction of urban memory.

Key words： urban memory culture performance memory activation memory heritance museum

基金资助:广东省自然科学基金（2016A030313818）；大学生创新创业项目（201810559147）

通讯作者: 刘璐（1994—），女，河北石家庄人，硕士研究生，研究方向为旅游开发与规划，（E-mail）luisa0316@163.com。

作者简介: 文彤（1975—），男，四川成都人，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为城市旅游规划、旅游小企业管理，（E-mail）wentong@jnu.edu.cn；

引用本文:

. 博物馆文化展演与城市记忆活化传承 ——基于旅游留言档案的文本分析[J]. 热带地理, 2019, 39(2): 267-277.

. Activation and Inheritance of Urban Memory and Cultural Performance in Museums： An Analysis of Tourist Comments on a Museum in Guangzhou[J]. TROPICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 39(2): 267-277.

链接本文:

http://www.rddl.com.cn/CN/10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003120 或 http://www.rddl.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V39/I2/267

	Bedford L. 2010. Storytelling: The Real Work of Museums. Curator the Museum Journal, 44(1): 27-34.
	Brieber D, Nadal M and Leder H. 2015. In the white cube: Museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art. Acta Psychologica，154: 36-42.
	曹珊，段进宇，侯硕，邢晓娟. 2012. 从城市记忆度评测看北京中轴线. 北京规划建设，（2）：101-105．[Can Shan，Duan Jinyu, Hou Shuo and Xing Xiaojuan. 2012. View the central axis of Beijing from the city memory evaluation. The Annual Contents of Beijing City Planning& Construction Review, (2): 101-105. ]
	陈建娜. 2013. 拉住即将消失的城市记忆. 城市问题，（4）：2-6．[Chen Jianna. 2013. Protect the city memory. Urban Problems, (4): 2-6. ]
	陈霖. 2016. 城市认同叙事的展演空间——以苏州博物馆新馆为例. 新闻与传播研究，（8）：49-66．[Chen Lin．2016．The Performative Space for City Identity Narrative: A Case Study on Suzhou Museum. Journalism & Communication, (8): 49-66. ]
	池梦祎．2015．国内旅游留言档案建设探究．昆明：云南大学．[Chi Mengyi．2015．Research on the construction of domestic tourism message archives．Kunming: Yunnan University. ]
	Dwyer O J and Alderman D H．2008．Memorial landscapes: analytic questions and metaphors. GeoJournal, 73(3): 165-178．
	Dudley S H．2013．Museum materialities: objects, engagements, interpretations. Mind Culture & Activity, 20(3): 308-311．
	光映炯，黄静华，光映霞．2014a．旅游展演·行为实践·社会交流——以丽江玉水寨“东巴法会”为例．广西民族研究，（4）：158-165．[Guang Yingjiong, Huang Jinghua and Guang Yingxia. 2014a. Tourist Performance, Behavior Practice and Social Communication: Taking “Dongba Dharma Assembly” of Yushuizhai, Lijiang as an Example. Study of Ethnics in Guangxi, (4): 158-165. ]
	光映炯．2017b．认识“旅游展演”：基于“行为—文化—场域”的阐释路径．广西民族研究，（5）：114-121．[Guang Yingjiong．2017b．
	Tourism Performance：Based on The Interpretation Path of Behavior- Culture-Field．Study of Ethnics in Guangxi, (5): 114-121. ]
	洪艳，陶伟．2006．游客对解说媒体的需求研究——以西汉南越王博物馆为例．旅游学刊，21（11）：43-48．[Hong Yan and Tao Wei. 2006. Tourists’ Demands for Interpretative Media: A Case of the Museum of the Mausoleum of the Nanyue King. Tourism Tribune, 21(11): 43-48 .]
	黄振平．2005．博物馆：城市记忆、标志及通向未来的文化桥梁．艺术百家，（6）：7-9．[Huang Zhenping．2005．Museums: The City’s Memory, Logo and Bridge to the Future Culture. Hundred Schools in Arts, (6): 7-9．]
	贾学颖．2014．城市博物馆——承载记忆、传播文化//中国博物馆协会城市博物馆专业委员会．城市记忆的变奏——中国博物馆协会城市博物馆专业委员会论文集．北京：中国博物馆学会．[Jia Xueying．2013．Urban museum-carrying memory and spreading culture．In: Urban museum Professional Committee of China Museum Association．Variation of urban memory-collected papers of urban museum professional committee of China museum association．Beijing: Chinese Museum Society．]
	杰西卡·安德森·特纳，杨利慧（译）．2014．旅游景点的文化展演之研究．民族艺术，（1）：7-12，18．[Jessica Anderson Turner and Yang Lihui (Translation)．2014．A study of cultural performances in tourist attractions．National Arts Bimonthly, (1): 7-12, 18．]
	孔旭红．2008．场所依赖理论在博物馆旅游解说系统中的应用．软科学，22（3）：89-91．[Kong Xuhong．2008．The Application of the Place Attachment Theory in the Museum Interpretation System．Soft Science, 22(3): 89-91．]
	卡罗尔·邓肯．2010．仪式的文明化：内观公共艺术博物馆．王文婷，译．（2018-11-02）[2018-12-13]．http://www.cafamuseum.org/exhibit/ newsdetail/1742．[Carol Duncan．2010．Civilization of Rituals: Inner View Museum of Public Art．Wang Wenting, Trans.．（2018-11-02）[2018-12-13]．http://www.cafamuseum.org/exhibit/ newsdetail/1742．]
	Little Walter E．2000．Home as a place of exhibition and performance: Mayan household transformation in Guatemala．Ethnology, 39(2): 163-182．
	Lord B．2006．Foucault’s museum: difference, representation, and genealogy．Museum & Society, 4(1): 11-14．
	Lu F．2017．Museum architecture as spatial storytelling of historical time: Manifesting a primary example of Jewish space in Yad Vashem Holocaust History Museum．Frontiers of Architectural Research, 28(2): 13-18．
	李虎．2011．仪式展演·集体记忆·他者表述——基于一个客家村落“会期”仪式之思考．民俗研究，（4）：249-259．[ Li Hu．2011．Ritual performance, collective memory and other expression-based on a Hakka village “meeting period” ritual thinking．Folklore Studies, (4): 249-259．]
	李中义．2013．动态的时空延展——博物馆以城市记忆推动文化传承创新//中国博物馆协会城市博物馆专业委员会．城市记忆的变奏——中国博物馆协会城市博物馆专业委员会论文集．北京：中国博物馆学会．[Li Zhongyi．2013．Museums promote cultural inheritance and innovation with urban memory．In: Urban museum Professional Committee of China Museum Association．Variation of urban memory- collected papers of urban museum professional committee of China museum association．Beijing: Chinese Museum Society．]
	李王鸣，江佳遥，沈婷婷．2010．城市记忆的测度与传承——以杭州小营巷为例．城市问题，（1）：21-26．[Li Wangming, Wang Jiayao and Shen Tingting．2010．Measurement and inheritance of urban memory -a case study of Xiaoying lane in Hangzhou．Urban Problems, (1): 21-26．]
	李彦辉，朱竑．2012．国外人文地理学关于记忆研究的进展与启示．人文地理，27（1）：11-15．[Li Yanhui and Zhu Hong．2012．A review and revelation on memory studies of foreign human geography．Human Geography, 27(1): 11-15．]
	刘改芳，张东燕．2008．文化遗产类旅游景区解说系统评价——以平遥古城为例．山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版），31（5）：96-100．[Liu Gaifang and Zang Dongyan．2008．Interpretation system evaluation of cultural heritage tourism scenic spots-taking Pingyao ancient city as an example．Journal of Shanxi University, 31(5): 96-100．]
	刘俊，马风华．2005．经济发达地区地方性博物馆旅游发展研究——以广州南越王墓博物馆为例．旅游科学，19（5）：38-45．[Liu Jun and Ma Fenghua．2005．A Study of Regional Museum Tourism Development in the Economically Developed Areas: A Case Study of Nanyue Mausoleum Museum in Guangzhou．Tourism Science, 19(5): 38-45．]
	刘勋．2017．丽江古城文化旅游的舞台真实和主客关系思考//第二届EBMEI教育信息和管理国际学术会．第二届EBMEI教育、信息与管理国际会议论文集. 突尼斯：新加坡管理与运动科学研究学会．[Liu Xun．2017．Reflection on stage reality and host-guest relationship of cultural tourism in Lijiang ancient city. Proceedings of 2017 2nd EBMEI International Conference on Education, Information and Management (EBMEI-EIM 2017). 2017 2nd EBMEI International Conference on Education, Information and Management. Tunis: Singapore management and sports science research society．]
	莫里斯·哈布瓦赫．2002．论集体记忆．毕然等，译．上海：上海人民出版社．[Maurice Halbwachs．2002．Collective Memory．Bi Ran, Trans.．Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House．]
	Mumford L．1961．The city in history: its origins, its transformations, and its prospects．American Journal of Sociology，（2）：5．
	马东娟．2016．基于城市记忆的历史街区游客感知研究．西安：西安外国语大学．[Ma Dongjuan．2016．Research on tourists’ perception of historic blocks based on city memory．Xi’an: Xi’an International Studies University．]
	潘峰．2009．“同根同源”的文化展演．北京：中央民族大学．[Pan Feng．2009．A cultural performance of “one root, one origin”．Beijing: Minzu University of China．]
	濮波．2016．欧文·戈夫曼的拟剧或表演社会化理论透视．剧作家，（2）：156-159．[Pu Bo．2016．A theoretical perspective on the socialization of play or performance by Irving Goffman．Playwright, (2): 156-159．]
	皮埃尔·诺拉．2015．记忆之场．黄艳红，等．译．南京：南京大学出版社．[Pierre Nora．2015．Memory Field．Huang Yanhong, et al.. Trans.．Nanjing: Nanjing University Press．]
	曲彦慧．2018．“舞台化”真实理论在文化旅游开发中的应用研究．嘉应学院学报，26（5）：76-81．[Qu Yanhui．2018．An Applied Research of “the Staged” Authenticity in Cultural Tourism development．Journal of Jiaying University, 26(5): 76-81．]
	沈坚．2010．记忆与历史的博弈：法国记忆史的建构．中国社会科学，（3）：205-219．[Shen Jian．2010．The game between memory and history: the construction of memory history in France．Chinese Social Sciences，(3): 205-219．]
	宋峰，熊忻恺．2012．国家遗产·集体记忆·文化认同．中国园林，（11）：23-26．[Song Feng and Xiong Qinkai．2012．National heritage, collective memory and cultural identity．Chinese Landscape Architecture, (11): 23-26．]
	尚杰．2005．空间的哲学：福柯的“异托邦”概念．同济大学学报（社会科学版），（3）：18-24．[Shang Jie．2005．Philosophy of space: Foucault’s concept of “heterotopia”．Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Edition), (3): 18-24．]
	陶伟，杜小芳，洪艳．2009．解说：一种重要的遗产保护策略．旅游学刊，24（8）：47-52．[Tao Wei, Du Xiaofang and Hong Yan．2009．
	Interpretation: An Important Tactics for Heritage Conservation．Tourism Tribune, 24(8): 47-52．]
	唐元．2018．体验式文化展演的空间生产与记忆建构——以《又见敦煌》为例．艺术百家，34（3）：212-216．[Tang Yuan．2018．Space Production and Memory Construction of Experiential Culture Performance：A Case Study of “See Dunhuang Again”．Hundred Schools in Arts, 34(3): 212-216．]
	Kali T．2015．The museum and the city: Towards a new architectural and museological model for the museum?．City, Culture and Society, 6(4): 109-115．
	汪芳，严琳，吴必虎．2010．城市记忆规划研究——以北京市宣武区为例．国际城市规划，25（1）：71-76．[Wang Fang, Yan Lin and Wu Bihu．2010．Collective Memory of City Planning: Xuanwu District in Beijing as a Case Study．Urban Planning International, 25(1): 71-76．]
	王真真．2012．中国旅游在线评论对旅游消费者购买决策影响的实证研究．北京：北京第二外国语学院．[Wang Zhenzhen．2012．An empirical study on the impact of online travel reviews on travel consumers’ purchasing decisions in China．Beijing: Beijing International Studies University．]
	文彤，张茜．2016．城市空间重塑与城市记忆感知——以佛山岭南天地为例．城市问题，（9）：42-47．[Wen Tong and Zhang Xi．2016．Urban space remodeling and urban memory perception-A case study of Lingnan Tiandi of Foshan．Urban Problems, (9): 42-47．]
	文彤．2014．基于民众的城市传统文化传承与发展——以香港为例．城市发展研究，（10）：120-124．[Wen Tong．2014．Urban Residents and Traditional Culture Protection: A Case Study in HongKong．Urban Studies, (10): 120-124．]
	吴晓．2010．景观凝视与民间艺术旅游展演的意义生产．民族艺术，（4）：48-51．[Wu Xiao．2010．Landscape gazing and significance production of folk art tourism exhibition．National Arts Bimonthly, (4): 48-51．]
	薛菲．2006．城市开放空间风景园林设计与城市记忆研究——深圳中心区公园设计案例．中国园林，22（9）：27-32．[Xue Fei．2006．Urban open space landscape architecture design and urban memory research- a case study of park design in central district of Shenzhen．Chinese Landscape Architecture, 22(9): 27-32．]
	肖君．2013．关于博物馆解说与解说系统创新发展的思考//广西壮族自治区博物馆．广西壮族自治区博物馆第六届学术研讨会论文集．广西：广西壮族自治区博物馆．[Xiao Jun．2013．Thoughts on the innovation and development of museum interpretation and interpretation system．In: Museum of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Collected papers of the 6th academic seminar of Guangxi zhuang autonomous region museum．Guangxi: Museum of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region．]
	徐玲，赵慧君．2017．真实与重构：博物馆展示本质的思考．东南文化，（1）：115-120，127-128．[Xu Ling and Zhao Huijun．2017．Reality and reconstruction: reflection on the essence of museum display．Southeast Culture, (1): 115-120, 127-128．]
	Su Yaohua and Teng Weichen．2018．Contemplating museums’ service failure: Extracting the service quality dimensions of museums from negative on-line reviews．Tourism Management, 69: 214-222．
	燕海鸣．2013．博物馆与集体记忆——知识、认同、话语．中国博物馆，（3）：14-18．[Yan Haiming．2013．Museums and collective memory -knowledge, identity, discourse．Chinese Museums, (3): 14-18．]
	杨彧．2011．博物馆文化要素在公共环境设计中的运用研究．长沙：湖南师范大学．[Yang Yu．2011．Research on the application of museum cultural elements in public environment design．Changsha: Hunan Normal University．]
	杨红梅．2013．广义博物馆观念下的博物馆与城市记忆//中国博物馆协会城市博物馆专业委员会．城市记忆的变奏——中国博物馆协会城市博物馆专业委员会论文集．北京：中国博物馆学会．[Yang Hongmei．2013． Museum and city memory under the broad concept of museum．In: Urban museum Professional Committee of China Museum Association．Variation of urban memory. collected papers of urban museum professional committee of China museum association．Beijing: Chinese Museum Society．]
	尹凯．2015．剧场、游戏与文化展演——以国家大剧院古戏台活动为例．民族艺林，（1）：81-86．[Yin Kai．2015．Theater, games and cultural performances-a case study of the ancient stage activities of the national center for the performing arts．Journal of Ethnic Art, (1): 81-86．]
	周玮，黄震方，唐文跃，沈苏彦．2014．基于城市记忆的文化旅游地游后感知维度分异——以南京夫子庙秦淮风光带为例．旅游学刊，（3）：73-83．[Zhou Wei, Huang Zhenfang, Tang Wenyue and Shen Suyan．2014．Research on the Differentiation of Perceived Dimensions after the Trip of the Cultural Tourism Destination based on the Urban Memory: A Case Study of Confucius Temple-Qinhuai River Scenic Area of Nanjing．Tourism Tribune, (3): 73-83．]
	周玮，朱云峰．2015a．近20年城市记忆研究综述．城市问题，（3）：2-10．[Zhou Wei and Zhu Yunfeng．2015a．A review of the research on urban memory in recent 20 years．Urban Problems, (3): 2-10．]
	周玮．2015b．城市记忆的概念辨析与理论阐释．南京工业职业技术学院学报，（2）：42-44．[Zhou Wei．2015b．Concept discrimination and theoretical explanation of urban memory．Journal of Nanjing Polytechnic Institute, (2): 42-44．]
	周晓冬，任娟．2009．基于城市记忆系统的天津五大道地区城市记忆要素分析．城市建筑，（6）：97-99．[Zhou Xiaodong and Ren Juan．2009．
	An analysis of the elements of urban memory in Tianjin Fifth Avenue
	based on the urban memory system．Urban Construction, (6): 97-99．]
	朱江勇．2014．“舞台互动”：旅游表演学视域下的旅游展演空间．旅游论坛，7（2）：87-93．[Zhu Jiangyong．2014．“Stage interaction”: tourism exhibition space from the perspective of tourism performance science．Tourism Forum, 7(2): 87-93．]
	朱江勇．2015．角色互动：旅游表演场域中的角色及角色关系．旅游论坛，（1）：87-94．[Zhu Jiangyong．2015．Role interaction: role and role relationship in tourism performance field．Tourism Forum, 7(2): 87-93．]
	朱蓉．2005．城市记忆与城市形态．南京：东南大学．[Zhu Rong．2005．
	Urban memory and urban form．Nanjing: Southeast University．]
	左冰，周东营．2014．基于SEM的黄埔军校旧址纪念馆旅游解说效果评价．热带地理，34（2）：209-216．[Zuo Bing and Zhou Dongying．2014．Interpretation and National Identity Constructing in the Whampoa Military Academy Memorial: An Effectiveness Assessment Based on SEM．Tropical Geography, 34(2): 209-216．]
	赵鹏，黄成林．2011．基于“舞台真实性理论”的旅游演艺产品开发——以大型山水实景演出为例．乐山师范学院学报，26（12）：35-37．[Zhao Peng and Huang Chenglin．2011．Tourism performance product development based on “stage authenticity theory”-a case study of large-scale landscape performance．Journal of Leshan Normal University, 26(12): 35-37．]