粤港澳大湾区协同发展水平的测度及评估

doi:10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003434

Abstract

Abstract:

On the basis of fully understanding the scientific connotation of coordinated development of urban agglomeration in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, the evaluation index system of coordinated development is constructed from four dimensions: industrial coordinative innovation, environmental coordinative governance, service coordinative sharing and institutional coordinative arrangement. The theory and method of space of flows, big data, network analysis and interlocking network model are comprehensively used to quantitatively analyze the interurban relationship, liquidity, connectivity and boundary effect. The research shows that: 1) Interurban capital flow is concentrated between Guangzhou and Shenzhen, and interurban knowledge flow is concentrated among Hong Kong, Guangzhou and Shenzhen. Macao, Zhuhai, Zhongshan and Jiangmen have higher level of collaborative environmental governance, while Shenzhen-Dongguan-Huizhou and Guangzhou-Foshan have lower level of collaborative environmental governance. The interurban service coordination sharing level of infrastructure such as transportation, communications, logistics and banking is higher among cities of Guangzhou-Shenzhen, Guangzhou-Foshan and Shenzhen-Dongguan. And Hong Kong and Macao have institutional advantages in cross-border regional coordination. 2) Guangzhou and Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Foshan, Shenzhen and Dongguan, and Hong Kong and Shenzhen have the best level of coordinated development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. At the same time, Guangzhou and Dongguan, Shenzhen and Foshan show a linkage trend. Although the de-boundary trend is obvious and the interurban liquidity is enhanced, the coordinated development level of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is generally not high. 3) The collaborative capacity of Guangzhou and Shenzhen is the strongest, and there is still much room for improvement in the collaborative capacity of the two international cities, Hong Kong and Macao. It is of great practical value to deeply understand the typical characteristics and potential trends of the coordinated development of urban agglomeration in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area for the construction of international first-class bay area and world-class urban agglomeration.

Key words: Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, coordinated development, space of flows, urban connectivity, urban network

CLC Number:

F127

Changjian Wang, Yuyao Ye, Fei Wang, Zhengdong Huang, Qijun Li, Yu Chen, Haoxi Lin, Kangmin Wu, Xiaojie Lin, Hong'ou Zhang. Measurement and Evaluation of the Coordinated Development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area[J].Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 206-219.

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Indicators related to coordinated development

指标体系	主要内容	说明
SDGs 可持续发展目标	2015年，可持续发展目标（Sustainable Development Goals，SDGs）在联合国可持续发展峰会上正式通过，SDG由17个可持续发展目标，以分类、分级和分层为原则，并通过估算历时性数据来观测各个国家/地区的发展变化趋势，旨在通过综合方式彻底解决社会、经济和环境3个维度的发展问题。	① 构建分17维度指标体系，具体指标有200多个； ② 可持续发展能力测度，侧重规模、水平和能力的测度，同时关注跨界流域治理、国家间科技合作、南南合作、伙伴关系等。
GII全球创新指数	由世界知识产权组织（WIPO）、康奈尔大学（Cornell University）和英士国际商学院（INSEAD）发布，GII总得分是投入和产出次级指数得分的简单平均数。投入类指标包含：1）制度；2）人力资本和研究；3）基础设施；4）市场成熟度；5）商业成熟度；产出类指标包含：6）知识和技术产出；7）创意产出。（详见：https：//www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/）	① 构建分投入和产出等维度指标体系； ② 创新要素集聚能力测度，技术合作和创新网络是创新生态系统的一个重要组成部分。
ACEP一体化发展指数	城市群一体化发展指数由中国发展研究基金会发布，从经济集聚度（A）、区域连接性（C）、经济均等化（E）、政策协同（P）4个方面来刻画区域的一体化，由此形成了ACEP指数。	① 构建分集聚、连接、均等、协同等维度指标体系； ② 区域一体化关系测度，侧重城市与城市之间相互关系的测度
GaWC全球城市排名	全球化与世界级城市研究小组与网络着眼于高级生产性服务业在全球的分布，以此定位城市在世界中的连通性。通过生产性服务业（金融、广告、法律、会计、管理咨询等）的全球布局，衡量所在城市的全球连通性（Global Network Connectivities）。（详见：https：//www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/group.html）	GaWC着眼于高级生产性服务业在全球的分布，以此定位城市在世界中的连通性。

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig. 3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

References 0

	Castells M. 2004. Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: A Theoretical Blueprint. In: Castells M. The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781845421663.00010.
	Castells M. 2009. The New Economy: Informationalism, Globalization, Networking. In: Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society. 77-162. New Jersey: Wiley‐Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514.ch2.
	蔡赤萌．2017．粤港澳大湾区城市群建设的战略意义和现实挑战．广东社会科学，186（4）：5-14，254．[Cai Chimeng. 2017. The Building of a World-Class City Cluster in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Strategic Meanings and Challenges. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 186(4): 5-14, 254.]
	陈世栋．2018．粤港澳大湾区要素流动空间特征及国际对接路径研究．华南师范大学学报（社会科学版），（2）：27-32．[Chen Shidong. 2018. Research on the Spatial Characteristics of Factor Flow and Its International Integration Path in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay Area. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), (2): 27-32.]
	邓志新．2017．粤港澳大湾区：珠三角发展的新引擎．广东经济，（5）：32-35．[Deng Zhixin. 2017. Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area: A New Engine for the Development of the Pearl River Delta. Guangdong Economy, (5): 32-35.]
	董超，修春亮，魏冶．2014．基于通信流的吉林省流空间网络格局．地理学报，69（4）：510-519．[Dong Chao, Xiu Chunliang and Wei Ye. 2014. Network Structure of 'Space of Flows' in Jilin Province Based on Telecommunication Flows. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(4): 510-519.]
	樊杰，王亚飞，梁博．2019．中国区域发展格局演变过程与调控．地理学报，74（12）：2437-2454．[Fan Jie, Wang Yafei and Liang Bo. 2019. The Evolution Process and Regulation of China's Regional Development Pattern. Acta Geographica Sinica,74(12): 2437-2454.]
	方创琳，梁龙武，王振波．2020．京津冀城市群可持续爬升规律的定量模拟及验证．中国科学：地球科学，50（1）：104-121．[Fang Chuanglin, Liang Longwu and Wang Zhenbo. 2020. Quantitative Simulation and Verification of Upgrade Law of Sustainable Development in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 50(1): 104-121.]
	方创琳．2017．京津冀城市群协同发展的理论基础与规律性分析．地理科学进展，36（1）：15-24．[Fang Chuanglin. 2017. Theoretical Foundation and Patterns of Coordinated Development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration. Progress in Geography, 36(1): 15-24.]
	方远平，彭婷，陆莲芯，毕斗斗，陈再齐．2019．粤港澳大湾区城市职能演变特征与影响因素．热带地理，39（5）：647-660．[Fang Yuanping, Peng Ting, Lu Lianxin, Bi Doudou and Chen Zaiqi. 2019. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Function Evolution in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Tropical Geography, 39(5): 647-660.]
	李立勋．2017．关于“粤港澳大湾区”的若干思考．热带地理，37（6）：757-761．[Li Lixun. 2017. Thinking on the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Tropical Geography, 37(6): 757-761.]
	李郇，殷江滨．2012．国外区域一体化对产业影响研究综述．城市规划，36（5）：91-96．[Li Xun and Yin Jiangbin. 2012. Research Review on the Effects of Regional Integration on Industry. City Planning Review, 36(5): 91-96.]
	李郇，周金苗，黄耀福，黄玫瑜．2018．从巨型城市区域视角审视粤港澳大湾区空间结构．地理科学进展，37（12）：1609-1622．[Li Xun, Zhou Jinmiao, Huang Yaofu and Huang Meiyu. 2018. Understanding the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from the Perspective of Mega-City Region. Progress in Geography,37(12): 1609-1622.]
	李颖，陈婷婷，李郇，许伟攀，郎嵬．2020．基于手机信令的跨界地区职住中心识别及其模式——以广佛地区为例．热带地理，40（2）：206-216．[Li Ying, Chen Tingting, Li Xun, Xu Weipan and Lang Wei. 2020. Identification and Patterns of Employment and Residential Centers in a Cross-Border Region Based on Mobile Phone Signaling Data: A Case Study of Guangzhou and Foshan. Tropical Geography, 40(2): 206-216.]
	林初昇．2017．“粤港澳大湾区”城市群发展规划之可为与不可为．热带地理，37（6）：755-756，761．[George C S LIN. 2017. Planning for the Development of the City-Regions in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: What Can and Cannot be Done. Tropical Geography, 37(6): 755-756, 761.]
	林涛．2019．城市网络：中国城市地理研究的前沿和热点领域．科学，71（4）：25-29，4．[Lin Tao. 2019. City Network: A Geographical Research Focus and Frontier in China. Science, 71(4): 25-29, 4.]
	刘锦，田银生．2018．粤港澳大湾区背景下的珠三角城市群产业-人口-空间交互影响机理．地理科学进展，37（12）：1653-1662．[Liu Jin and Tian Yinsheng. 2018. Mutual Influencing Mechanism of Industry-Population-Space in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration in the Context of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Development. Progress in Geography, 37(12): 1653-1662.]
	刘毅，王云，杨宇，马丽．2019．粤港澳大湾区区域一体化及其互动关系．地理学报，74（12）：2455-2466．[Liu Yi, Wang Yun, Yang Yu and Ma Li. 2019. Regional Integration and Interaction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(12): 2455-2466.]
	刘毅，杨宇，康蕾，王云．2020a．新时代粤港澳大湾区人地关系的全球模式与区域响应．地理研究，39（9）：1949-1957．[Liu Yi, Yang Yu, Kang Lei and Wang Yun. 2020a. Human-Environment System in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Global Model and Local Response. Geographical Research, 39(9): 1949-1957.]
	刘毅，王云，李宏．2020b．世界级湾区产业发展对粤港澳大湾区建设的启示．中国科学院院刊，35（3）：312-321．[Liu Yi, Wang Yun and Li Hong. 2020b. Industrial Development of World-Class Bay Areas and Its Enlightenment to the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(3): 312-321.]
	刘云刚，侯璐璐，许志桦．2018．粤港澳大湾区跨境区域协调：现状、问题与展望．城市观察，（1）：7-25．[Liu Yungang, Hou Lulu and Xu Zhihua. 2018. Cross-Border Collaboration in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Progress, Problems and Prospect. Urban Insight, (1): 7-25.]
	陆大道．2017．关于珠江三角洲大城市群与泛珠三角经济合作区的发展问题．经济地理，37（4）：1-4．[Lu Dadao. 2017. Development of Pearl River Delta Metropolitan Group and Pan-Pearl River Delta Economic Cooperation Zone. Economic Geography, 37(4): 1-4.]
	陆大道．2018．长江大保护与长江经济带的可持续发展——关于落实习总书记重要指示，实现长江经济带可持续发展的认识与建议．地理学报，73（10）：1829-1836．[Lu Dadao. 2018. Conservation of the Yangtza River and Sustainable Development of the Yangtze River Economic Belt: An Understanding of General Secretary Xi Jinping's Important Instructions and Suggestions for Their Implementation. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(10): 1829-1836.]
	马海涛，黄晓东，李迎成．2018．粤港澳大湾区城市群知识多中心的演化过程与机理．地理学报，73（12）：2297-2314．[Ma Haitao, Huang Xiaodong and Li Yingcheng. 2018. The Evolution and Mechanisms of Megalopolitan Knowledge Polycentricity of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(12): 2297-2314.]
	马向明，陈洋．2017．粤港澳大湾区：新阶段与新挑战．热带地理，37（6）：762-774．[Ma Xiangming and Chen Yang. 2017. The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A New Era and a Big Challenge. Tropical Geography, 37(6): 762-774.]
	毛艳华，荣健欣．2018．粤港澳大湾区的战略定位与协同发展．华南师范大学学报（社会科学版），50（4）：104-109，191．[Mao Yanhua and Rong Jianxin. 2018. Strategic Positioning and Collaborative Development of Guangdong-Hongkong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition),50(4): 104-109, 191.]
	倪鹏飞，刘凯，彼得·泰勒．2011．中国城市联系度：基于联锁网络模型的测度．经济社会体制比较，158（6）：96-103．[Ni Pengfei, Liu Kai and Taylor Peter. 2011. Urban Connectivity in China: Measurement Based on Interlocking Network Model. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 158(6): 96-103.]
	潘泽强，宁超乔，袁媛．2019．协作式环境管理在粤港澳大湾区中的应用——以跨界河治理为例．热带地理，39（5）：661-670．[Pan Zeqiang, Ning Chaoqiao and Yuan Yuan. 2019. Collaborative Environmental Management in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Based on Cross-Border Rivers. Tropical Geography, 39(5): 661-670.]
	彭芳梅．2017．粤港澳大湾区及周边城市经济空间联系与空间结构——基于改进引力模型与社会网络分析的实证分析．经济地理，37（12）：57-64．[Peng Fangmei. 2017. Economic Spatial Connection and Spatial Structure of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay and the Surrounding Area Cities－An Empirical Analysis Based on Improved Gravity Model and Social Network Analysis. Economic Geography, 37(12): 57-64.]
	邱坚坚，刘毅华，陈浩然，高枫．2019．流空间视角下的粤港澳大湾区空间网络格局——基于信息流与交通流的对比分析．经济地理，39（6）：7-15．[Qiu Jianjian, Liu Yihua, Chen Haoran and Gao Feng. 2019. Urban Network Structure of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area with the View of Space of Flows: A Comparison Between Information Flow and Transportation Flow. Economic Geography,39(6): 7-15.]
	史培军，宋长青，程昌秀．2019．地理协同论——从理解“人—地关系”到设计“人—地协同”．地理学报，74（1）：3-15．[Shi Peijun, Song Changqing and Cheng Changxiu. 2019. Geographical Synergetics—From Understanding Human-Environment Relationship to Designing Human-Environment Synergy. Acta Geographica Sinica, 74(1): 3-15.]
	Taylor P J. 2001. Specification of the World City Network. Geographical Analysis, 33(2): 181-194.
	Taylor P J. 2005. Leading World Cities: Empirical Evaluations of Urban Nodes in Multiple Networks. Urban Studies, 42(9): 1593-1608.
	唐子来，李涛，李粲．2017．中国主要城市关联网络研究．城市规划，41（1）：28-39，82．[Tang Zilai, Li Tao and Li Can. 2017. Research on the Interlocking Network of Major Cities in China. City Planning Review, 41(1): 28-39, 82.]
	向晓梅，杨娟．2018．粤港澳大湾区产业协同发展的机制和模式．华南师范大学学报（社会科学版），50（2）：17-20．[Xiang Xiaomei and Yang Juan. 2018. The Paths of the Industrial Synergy Development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Bay Area. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition),50(2): 17-20.]
	许堞，马丽．2020．粤港澳大湾区环境协同治理制约因素与推进路径．地理研究，39（9）：2165-2175．[Xu Die and Ma Li. 2020. Restrictive Factors and Promoting Approaches on Collaborative Ecological Environment Governance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Geographical Research,39(9): 2165-2175.]
	许学强，李郇．2009．改革开放30年珠江三角洲城镇化的回顾与展望．经济地理，29（1）：13-18．[Xu Xueqiang and Li Xun. 2009. Review and Preview of the Urbanization in Pearl River Delta in the Past 30 Years of Reform and Opening Up. Economic Geography, 29(1): 13-18.]
	许志桦，刘云刚，胡国华．2019．从珠三角到大珠三角再到粤港澳大湾区：改革开放以来中国的国家尺度重组．热带地理，39（5）：635-646．[Xu Zhihua, Liu Yungang and Hu Guohua. 2019. From the Pearl River Delta to the Greater Pearl River Delta and to the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: State Rescaling in Post-Reform China. Tropical Geography, 39(5): 635-646.]
	张虹鸥，王洋，叶玉瑶，金利霞，黄耿志．2018．粤港澳区域联动发展的关键科学问题与重点议题．地理科学进展，37（12）：1587-1596．[Zhang Hong'ou, Wang Yang, Ye Yuyao, Jin Lixia and Huang Gengzhi. 2018. Key Scientific Issues and Important Topics in the Joint Development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Region. Progress in Geography,37(12): 1587-1596.]
	张胜磊．2018．粤港澳大湾区发展路径和建设战略探讨：基于世界三大湾区的对比分析．中国发展，18（3）：53-59．[Zhang Shenglei. 2018. Discussion on the Developing Path and Construction Strategies of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Based on the Comparative Study Among Three Global Bay Areas. China Development, 18(3): 53-59.]
	赵晓斌，强卫，黄伟豪，线实．2018．粤港澳大湾区发展的理论框架与发展战略探究．地理科学进展，37（12）：1597-1608．[Zhao Xiaobin, Qiang Wei, Huang Weihao and Xian Shi. 2018. Theoretical Framework and Development Strategy of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Progress in Geography,37(12): 1597-1608.]
	钟韵，胡晓华．2017．粤港澳大湾区的构建与制度创新：理论基础与实施机制．经济学家，（12）：50-57．[Zhong Yun and Hu Xiaohua. 2017. Construction and Institutional Innovation of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area: Theoretical Basis and Implementation Mechanism. Economist, (12): 50-57.]
	钟韵，叶艺华，魏也华．2020．基于创新联系的城市网络特征及影响因素研究——以粤港澳地区为例．科技管理研究，40（7）：1-9．[Zhong Yun, Ye Yihua and Wei Yehua. 2020. Urban Network on Innovation Connection: Case Study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Area. Science and Technology Management Research, 40(7): 1-9.]
	钟韵，秦嫣然．2021．中国城市群的服务业协同集聚研究——基于长三角与珠三角的对比．广东社会科学，208（2）：5-15，254．[Zhong Yun and Qin Yanran. 2021. Co-Agglomeration of Service Industries Within Urban Agglomeration in China: Comparison Between the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 208(2): 5-15, 254.]
	周春山，罗利佳，史晨怡，王珏晗．2017．粤港澳大湾区经济发展时空演变特征及其影响因素．热带地理，37（6）：802-813．[Zhou Chunshan, Luo Lijia, Shi Chenyi and Wang Juehan. 2017. Spatio-Temporal Evolutionary Characteristics of the Economic Development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and Its Influencing Factors. Tropical Geography, 37(6): 802-813.]
	周春山，邓鸿鹄，史晨怡．2018．粤港澳大湾区协同发展特征及机制．规划师，34（4）：5-12．[Zhou Chunshan, Deng Honghu and Shi Chenyi. 2018. A Study on Synergic Development of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area. Planners, 34(4): 5-12.]

[1]	Kangmin Wu, Yuyao Ye, Hong'ou Zhang, Zuxin He, Xiangyu Wang, Zhijun Zheng. The Geographical Pattern and Diversity of Strategic Industry Technological Innovation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 183-194.
[2]	Haiyang Su, Renhuai Liu, Tong Wen. The Structure of Urban Tourism Information Network in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 220-235.
[3]	Qi Wang, Wei Chen, Chunzhu Wei. Participation of the Global Shipping Network in the Guangdong- Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 236-246.
[4]	Xuyan Song, Tiantian Peng, Gaojun Zhang. The Waterage Passenger Transportation Network in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 247-255.
[5]	Chengpeng Wu, Xianchun Zhang, Yingjie Hu. Comparative Study on the Governance Framework of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: From the Perspective of Institutional Environment [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 256-268.
[6]	Qijun Li, Leixian Guo, Yi Lei, Cheng'i Cheng, Xiao Sima. Spatial Connection Analysis and Coordinated Development Policy Mechanism Optimization in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from the Perspective of Policy [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 269-282.
[7]	Dening Chen, Kangmin Wu, Jiayu Wu, Renfeng Ma, Yanpeng Jiang. The Enlightenment of EU Cross-Border Cooperation Research on the Collaborative Governance in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 283-292.
[8]	Jiangmin Yang, Gengzhi Huang, Desheng Xue. A Review of Regional Environmental Governance Research in the West and Its Enlightenment to the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 293-304.
[9]	Chen Guo, Shu Feng, Moxi Tang, Zhengyu Tang, Zhipeng Yang. Scene Planning: Promoting Coordinated Development of Urban Agglomeration —A Case Study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 305-317.
[10]	Manzi Li, Aiping Zhu, Ying Wang, Jianyao Chen, Zuobing Liang, Qirui Wu, Di Tian, Gang Zeng, Liangjie Zhao. Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Sources of River Nitrogen in Typical Urbanized Areas in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 318-327.
[11]	Yuanyuan Mao, Zhengdong Zhang, Jianbin Dong, Yang Yang, Jun Cao, Songjia Chen, Tengfei Kuang. Construction and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from the Perspective of "Water-Energy-Food" [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 328-338.
[12]	Yuyao Ye, Xiangyu Wang, Jili Xu, Hong'ou Zhang, Zhengqian Liu, Jiayi Sun, Qin Lu. The Connotation and Mechanism Changes of Coordinated Development of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in the New Period [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 161-170.
[13]	Jiehan Ji, Yi Liu, Murong Mei, Xiaoling Zhu. Differences of Strategic Coupling Modes and Regional Collaboration in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 171-182.
[14]	Jianke Guo, Yidan Ding, Yafeng Qin. Spatial Links of the Maritime Scientific Research Cooperation Network in China [J]. Tropical Geography, 2021, 41(3): 584-595.
[15]	Leixian Guo, Xiaoli Wu, Xiaofang Guo, Xuejun Zhou, Changcheng Kan. Urban Functions of Guangzhou and Shenzhen Focusing on the City Network Relationship: A Comparative Analysis on the Original Places of Air Passenger Flow [J]. Tropical Geography, 2021, 41(2): 229-242.

Measurement and Evaluation of the Coordinated Development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 0

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0