城中村非正规空间自组织演化分析与启示——基于苏州沈巷村的思考
|
程杰(1995—),男,安徽绩溪人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为城乡规划设计与理论,(E-mail)643679111@qq.com; |
收稿日期: 2022-03-09
修回日期: 2022-09-19
网络出版日期: 2023-09-11
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(51778387)
江苏省社会科学基金项目(22LSD004)
江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(KYCX20_2782)
Analyzing the Self-Organized Evolution of Informal Spaces in Urban Villages: Reflections from Shenxiang Village in Suzhou
Received date: 2022-03-09
Revised date: 2022-09-19
Online published: 2023-09-11
城中村非正规空间是在社会需求的驱动下,自发形成的社会经济活动的空间嵌合体。揭示城中村非正规空间演化及其内在规律,可以为其治理和改造提供方向及策略。在分析城中村非正规空间自组织特征的基础上,以苏州沈巷村为例,根据空间组织主体,将城中村非正规空间的自组织演化划分为“个体导向的自创生”“关系导向的自扩张”“社会资本导向的自进化”3个阶段,剖析城中村非正规空间自组织演化的时空特征和演化机制。研究发现:1)在城中村非正规空间的自组织演化中,空间组织主体由“村内人”向“乡内人”和“圈内人”扩展。城中村非正规空间演化与重构,既是城中村社会关系网络拓展的外在表征,又是社会关系网络变迁的结果。2)在城中村非正规空间自组织演化过程中,从“自创生”阶段的血缘到“自进化”阶段的地缘和业缘,关系网络自始至终发挥着强化信任和凝聚共识等重要作用。3)需要尊重城中村自组织逻辑,采用自下而上的协商行动,有效推进城中村非正规空间的治理。
程杰 , 李昊泽 , 王勇 . 城中村非正规空间自组织演化分析与启示——基于苏州沈巷村的思考[J]. 热带地理, 2023 , 43(9) : 1800 -1808 . DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003735
Informal spaces in urban villages represent a spatial chimera of socio-economic activities arising from driving social demands. Investigating the evolution and inherent rules of such spaces can provide direction and strategies for good governance. This study analyzes the process and outcomes of the self-organized evolution of informal spaces by considering their self-organizational characteristics. Herein, the Shenxiang village, which is a typical mature urban village in Suzhou, was considered as an example. We adopted qualitative research methods, such as questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews. The agglomeration and formation of informal spaces in Shenxiang is the consequence of self-organized evolution. This can be attributed to the interaction of internal and external environments, which is influenced by the socio-cultural concepts of local villagers and relationships among external groups. Based on the main body of spatial organization, the self-organized evolution of informal spaces in urban villages was divided into the following stages: "individual-oriented self-creation," "relationship-oriented self-expansion," and "social capital-oriented self-evolution." Furthermore, the spatio-temporal characteristics and self-organizational-evolution mechanisms of these informal spaces were analyzed at each stage. The findings are as follows: (1) During the evolution of informal spaces, the main body of spatial organization expands from "village people" to "rural people" and "insiders." This is the consequence of self-organized evolution between villagers and alien groups. In urban villages, the evolution and reconstruction of informal spaces is caused by the expansion and variation in social relations. (2) During the self-organization and evolution of informal spaces, the relationship network is crucial in strengthening trust and building consensus, spanning blood relationships in the "self-creation" stage and geographical and industrial relationships in the "self-evolution" stage. The informal spatial self-organization of urban villages relies on the sub-social structure constructed by the original relationship network, which perpetuates the consensual regional culture, conceptual consciousness, and living habits, and enhances the cohesiveness and centripetal force of self-organization. This study aimed to gain deeper insights into informal spaces in urban villages, formulate a theoretical framework for their governance, and analyze the order and rules of internal self-organization. We believe that such informal spaces are self-balanced and relatively independent informal economies that facilitate a symbiotic relationship between local villagers and external groups. The transformation and optimization of informal spaces in urban villages is a potential challenge. The guiding approach for optimization promotes the following: forming informal space communities in urban villages, respecting and stimulating their self-organization order, adhering to the mutual unity principle of self-organization and external organizations, combining the external impetus and internal development capabilities of the system, and adopting bottom-up consultation actions to balance the group interest more efficiently. To promote the governance of informal spaces in urban villages, it is crucial to adhere to the logic and rules of their self-organization.
表1 城中村非正规空间分类与特征Table 1 Informal spatial classification and characteristics of urban villages |
| 分类与属性 | 城中村非正规空间的构成 |
|---|---|
| 组成分类 | 非正规廉租房、非正规商铺(无证商铺)、固定摊贩与流动摊贩等 非正规符号空间 |
| 分类标准 | 建筑空间的的“非正规”改造和使用、非正规经济活动的公共空间的投影 |
| 经济形式 | 租赁经济、地摊经济等非正规经济形式 流动摊贩、固定摊贩 |
| 空间特征 | 呈“内生式”的散布,基本覆盖全村,沿主要道路线性分布与镶嵌式集聚发展为主 |
| 社会属性 | 失地农民和外来弱势群体的生产空间和生活空间 |
表 2 沈巷村访谈案例基本情况Table 2 Basic information of interview cases in the Shenxiang Village |
| 受访者类型 | 经营产品 | 存续时间 | 发展缘由 | 社会特征 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 房东 | 住房出租与店铺出租 | 与城中村发展同步 | 亲友带动,自发联动 | 本村人与外来人口比例约为4∶1,年龄均为40岁以上 |
| 商铺店主 | 服装、餐饮、果蔬和 日用百货 | 1~10年,部分超过 10年 | 主动承包、二手转接 | 几乎均为外来人口,大部分以家庭为单位, 年龄以20~50岁为主 |
| 流动摊贩 | 食品日杂 | 1~5年 | 主动进入、同村带入 | |
| 固定摊贩 | 食品日杂、维修 | 大部分3年以上 | 主动进入、同村带入 |
表3 沈巷村非正规空间演化阶段及特征Table 3 Evolution stages and characteristics of informal space in the Shenxiang Village |
| 阶段 | 非正规空间分布 | 非正规空间形态 | 经济特征 | 社会特征 | 文化特征 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 自创生阶段 (1980—1989年) | 独立零散的个体现象与 半集聚化的规模发展 | 传统住宅形制和沿道路线性集中的空间形式 | 农业和务工为主, 非正规部门产生 | 血缘、地缘关系维系的村民社会; | 商业文化在乡村文化中逐步凸显 |
| 自扩张阶段 (1990—1999年) | 非正规空间平行布局与 边缘化集聚 | 延续原院落空间形制和流动摊贩集聚区规模扩大 | 非正规部门发展, 农业大幅度缩减 | 城乡二元社会,同质性转变为异质性; | 城市文化与外来文化开始进入 |
| 自进化阶段 (21世纪至今) | 沿主要道路集聚扩散,非正规空间逐步固定化、全村化 | 院落形态减弱,空间呈现一体化,新的摊贩集聚形式(夜市)出现 | 以非正规经济为主,非正规部门规模庞大 | 异质性突出,社会构成复杂化; | 城市、乡村与外来文化逐渐交融 |

程 杰:论文初步选题,调研与分析、论文撰写和修订;
李昊泽:案例收集、辅助调研与整理分析;
王 勇:整体构思与框架设计、论文写作指导与修改,终审论文。
|
Bromley R, and Mackie P. 2009. Displacement and the New Spaces for Informal Trade in the Latin American City Center. Urban Studies, 46(7): 1485-1506.
|
|
成得礼. 2008. 对中国城中村发展问题的再思考——基于失地农民可持续生计的角度. 城市发展研究,(3):68-79.
Cheng Deli. 2008. Rethinking the Development of Urban Villages in China: From the Perspective of Sustainable Livelihood of Landless Farmers. Urban Development Research, (3): 68-79.
|
|
Cross V. 2009. Resisting the Entrepreneurial City: Street Vendors' Struggle in Mexico City's Historic Center. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1): 43-63.
|
|
陈伟东,李雪萍. 2004. 社区自组织的要素与价值. 江汉论坛,(3):114-117.
Chen Weidong, and Li Xueping. 2004. The Elements and Value of Community Self-Organization. Jianghan Forum, (3): 114-117.
|
|
Dicken B. 2005. City of God. City, 9(3): 207-320.
|
|
Farouk B R, and Owusu M. 2012. "If in Doubt, Count": The Role of Community Driven Enumerations in Blocking Eviction in Old Fadama, Accra. Environment & Urbanization, (1): 47-57.
|
|
Gan Xinyue, Chen Yulin, Bian Lanchun, and Qian Fang. 2019. From Redevelopment to In Situ Upgrading: Transforming Urban Village Governance in Shenzhen through the Lens of Informality. China City Planning Review, 28(4): 30-41.
|
|
金云峰,李涛. 2020. 上海城乡绿地系统的自组织时空演化机理. 工业建筑,50(2):69-75,88.
Jin Yunfeng, and Li Tao. 2020. Spatial and Temporal Evolution Mechanism of Self-Organization of Urban and Rural Green Space System in Shanghai. Industrial Architecture, 50(2): 69-75, 88.
|
|
卡洛琳·斯金纳,凡妮莎·沃尔森,甘欣悦,刘一瑶. 2019. 发展中国家城市的非正规经济——挑战规划的窠臼. 国际城市规划,34(2):23-30.
Caroline Skinner, Walson Vanessa, Gan Xinyue, and Liu Yiyao. 2019. Urban Informal Economy in Developing Countries: A Challenge to Planning. Urban Planning International, 34(2): 23-30.
|
|
林雄斌,马学广,李贵才. 2014. 快速城市化下城中村非正规性的形成机制与治理. 经济地理,34(6):162-168.
Lin Xiongbin, Ma Xuegang, and Li Guicai. 2014. Formation Mechanism and Governance of Informal Nature in Urban Villages under Rapid Urbanization. Economic Geography, 34(6): 162-168.
|
|
龙元. 2006. 汉正街——一个非正规性城市. 时代建筑,(3):136-141.
Long Yuan. 2006. Hanzheng Street: An Informal City. Time Architecture, (3): 136-141.
|
|
蓝宇蕴. 2011. 论城中村改造对其非正式经济的影响——以广州城中村改造为例. 甘肃理论学刊,(2):77-82,2.
Lan Yuyun. 2011. On the Impact of Urban Village Reconstruction on Its Informal Economy: A Case Study of Urban Village Reconstruction in Guangzhou. Gansu Journal of Theory, (2): 77-82, 2.
|
|
宁一瑄,章征涛. 2014. 我国城市非正规空间研究综述和展望//中国城市规划学会. 城乡治理与规划改革——2014中国城市规划年会论文集(12. 居住区规划). 海口:中国城市规划学会,11.
Ning Yixuan, and Zhang Zhengtao. 2014. Review and Prospect of Urban Informal Space Research in China. In: China Urban Planning Society. Urban and Rural Governance and Planning Reform: Proceedings of the 2014 China Urban Planning Annual Conference (12. Residential Area Planning). Haikou: China Society of Urban Planning, 11.
|
|
Roy A. 2005. Urban Informality-Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, (2): 147-158.
|
|
Turner S. 2012. Street Vendor Livelihoods and Everyday Politics in Hanoi,Vietnam: The Seeds of a Diverse Economy. Urban Studies, 49(5): 1027-1044.
|
|
Watson V. 2014. African Urban Fantasies: Dreams or Nightmares?. Environment and Urbanization, 26(1): 215-231.
|
|
Webster Chris, Wu Fulong, Zhang Fangzhu, Sarkar Chinmoy. 2016. Informality, Property Rights, and Poverty in China's "Favelas". World Development, 78(4): 461-473.
|
|
魏立华,闫小培. 2005. “城中村”:存续前提下的转型——兼论“城中村”改造的可行性模式. 城市规划,(7):9-13,56.
Wei Lihua, and Yan Xiaopei. 2005. "Village in the City": Transformation under the Premise of Survival: On the Feasibility Model of "Village in the City" Transformation. City Planning Review, (7): 9-13, 56.
|
|
吴重庆. 2020. “同乡同业”:“社会经济”或“低端全国化”?. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),20(5):9-17.
Wu Chongqing. 2020. "Fellow Countrymen": "Social Economy" or "Low-End Nationalization"?. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 20(5): 9-17.
|
|
Wu Fulong. 2016. Housing in Chinese Urban Villages: The Dwellers, Conditions and Tenancy Informality. Housing Studies, 31(7): 852-870.
|
|
吴彤. 2001. 自组织方法论研究. 北京:清华大学出版社.
Wu Tong. 2001. Research on Self-Organization Methodology. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
|
|
肖作鹏,王小琦,李凯. 2011. 非正规城市化与非正规商业空间形态及形成机制——以深圳市平山村为例//中国城市规划学会,南京市政府. 转型与重构——2011中国城市规划年会论文集. 南京:中国城市规划学会,12.
Xiao Zuopeng, Wang Xiaoqi, and Li Kai. 2011. Informal Urbanization and Informal Commercial Spatial form and Formation Mechanism: A Case Study of Pingshan Village, Shenzhen. In: China Urban Planning Society, and Nanjing Municipal Government. Transformation and Reconstruction: Proceedings of 2011 China Urban Planning Annual Conference. Nanjing: China Urban Planning Society, 12.
|
|
徐苗,陈瑞. 2018. 城市非正规性及其规划治理的中外研究比较评述. 规划师,34(6):19-28.
Xu Miao, and Chen Rui. 2018. A Comparative Review of Urban Informality and Its Planning and Governance. Planners, 34(6): 19-28.
|
|
薛德升,黄耿志. 2008. 管制之外的“管制”:城中村非正规部门的空间集聚与生存状态——以广州市下渡村为例. 地理研究,27(6):1390-1398,1484. Xue Desheng, and Huang Gengzhi. 2008. "Regulation" Beyond Regulation: Spatial Agglomeration and Living Status of Informal Sector in Urban Villages: A Case Study of Xiadu Village, Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 27(6): 1390-1398, 1484.]
|
|
叶丹,张京祥. 2015. 日常生活实践视角下的非正规空间生产研究——以宁波市孔浦街区为例. 人文地理,30(5):57-64.
Ye Dan, and Zhang Jingxiang. 2015. A Study of Informal Space Production from the Perspective of Daily Life Practice: A Case Study of Kongpu District in Ningbo City. Human Geography, 30(5): 57-64.
|
|
尹晓颖,薛德升,闫小培. 2006. “城中村”非正规部门形成发展机制——以深圳市蔡屋围为例. 经济地理,26(6):969-973.
Yin Xiaoying, Xue Desheng, and Yan Xiaopei. 2006. Formation of Development Mechanism of Informal Sector in "Urban Villages": A Case Study of Caiwuwei City, Shenzhen. Economic Geography, 26(6): 969-973.
|
|
赵衡宇,过伟敏. 2016. 城市融入困境下的空间再造与价值重构——以移民聚居空间与“城中村”相关研究为例. 创意与设计,(5):32-39.
Zhao Hengyu, and Guo Weimin. 2016. Spatial Reconstruction and Value Reconstruction under the Dilemma of Urban Integration: A Case Study on the Relationship between Immigrant Settlement Space and "Urban Village". Creativity and Design, (5): 32-39.
|
|
赵静,闫小培. 2012. 城中村非正规住房供给市场形成原因分析:以深圳市为例. 城市问题,(3):74-87.
Zhao Jing, and Yan Xiaopei. 2012. Analysis on the Formation of Informal Housing Supply Market in Urban Villages: A Case Study of Shenzhen. Urban Problems, (3): 74-87.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |